Golf club head

ABSTRACT

A golf club head includes a body defining an interior cavity. The body includes a sole positioned at a bottom portion of the golf club head, a crown positioned at a top portion, and a skirt positioned around a periphery between the sole and crown. The body has a forward portion and a rearward portion. The club head includes a face positioned at the forward portion of the body. The face defines a striking surface having an ideal impact location at a golf club head origin. Embodiments include club heads for a fairway wood that at least one of a high moment of inertia, a low center-of-gravity, a thin crown and a high coefficient of restitution. A sleeve for easily disconnecting a shaft to the club head allows for selective adjustment of the head&#39;s loft and lie angle.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.14/575,745, filed Dec. 18, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 13/975,106, filed Aug. 23, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No.8,956,240, issued Feb. 17, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 13/873,128, filed Apr. 29, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No.8,753,222, issued Jun. 17, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 13/469,023, filed May 10, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No.8,430,763, issued Apr. 30, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 13/338,197, filed Dec. 27, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No.8,900,069, issued Dec. 2, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 61/427,772, filed Dec. 28, 2010, allof which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD

The present application concerns golf club heads, and more particularly,golf club heads having unique relationships between the club head's massmoments of inertia and center-of-gravity position, golf club headshaving a center of gravity projection that is near the center of theface of the golf club, golf club heads having unique relationshipsbetween loft and center of gravity projection location, and golf clubheads having increased striking face flexibility.

INCORPORATIONS BY REFERENCE

Other patents and patent applications concerning golf clubs, such asU.S. Pat. Nos. 7,407,447, 7,419,441, 7,513,296, and 7,753,806; U.S. Pat.Appl. Pub. Nos. 2004/0235584, 2005/0239575, 2010/0197424, and2011/0312347; U.S. patent application. Ser. Nos. 11/642,310, and11/648,013; and U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. Ser. Nos. 60/877,336 areincorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

BACKGROUND

Center-of-gravity (CG) and mass moments of inertia critically affect agolf club head's performance, such as launch angle and flight trajectoryon impact with a golf ball, among other characteristics.

A mass moment of inertia is a measure of a club head's resistance totwisting about the golf club head's center-of-gravity, for example onimpact with a golf ball. In general, a moment of inertia of a mass abouta given axis is proportional to the square of the distance of the massaway from the axis. In other words, increasing distance of a mass from agiven axis results in an increased moment of inertia of the mass aboutthat axis. Higher golf club head moments of inertia result in lower golfclub head rotation on impact with a golf ball, particularly on“off-center” impacts with a golf ball, e.g., mis-hits. Lower rotation inresponse to a mis-hit results in a player's perception that the clubhead is forgiving. Generally, one measure of “forgiveness” can bedefined as the ability of a golf club head to reduce the effects ofmis-hits on flight trajectory and shot distance, e.g., hits resultingfrom striking the golf ball at a less than ideal impact location on thegolf club head. Greater forgiveness of the golf club head generallyequates to a higher probability of hitting a straight golf shot.Moreover, higher moments of inertia typically result in greater ballspeed on impact with the golf club head, which can translate toincreased golf shot distance.

Most fairway wood club heads are intended to hit the ball directly fromthe ground, e.g., the fairway, although many golfers also use fairwaywoods to hit a ball from a tee. Accordingly, fairway woods are subjectto certain design constraints to maintain playability. For example,compared to typical drivers, which are usually designed to hit ballsfrom a tee, fairway woods often have a relatively shallow head height,providing a relatively lower center of gravity and a smaller top viewprofile for reducing contact with the ground. Such fairway woods inspireconfidence in golfers for hitting from the ground. Also, fairway woodstypically have a higher loft than most drivers, although some driversand fairway woods share similar lofts. For example, most fairway woodshave a loft greater than or equal to about 13 degrees, and most drivershave a loft between about 7 degrees and about 15 degrees.

Faced with constraints such as those just described, golf clubmanufacturers often must choose to improve one performancecharacteristic at the expense of another. For example, some conventionalgolf club heads offer increased moments of inertia to promoteforgiveness while at the same time incurring a higher than desiredCG-position and increased club head height. Club heads with high CGand/or large height might perform well when striking a ball positionedon a tee, such is the case with a driver, but not when hitting from theturf. Thus, conventional golf club heads that offer increased moments ofinertia for forgiveness often do not perform well as a fairway wood clubhead.

Although traditional fairway wood club heads generally have a low CGrelative to most traditional drivers, such clubs usually also sufferfrom correspondingly low mass moments of inertia. In part due to theirrelatively low CG, traditional fairway wood club heads offer acceptablelaunch angle and flight trajectory when the club head strikes the ballat or near the ideal impact location on the ball striking face. Butbecause of their low mass moments of inertia, traditional fairway woodclub heads are less forgiving than club heads with high moments ofinertia, which heretofore have been drivers. As already noted,conventional golf club heads that have increased mass moments ofinertia, and thus are more forgiving, have been ill-suited for use asfairway woods because of their relatively high CG.

Accordingly, to date, golf club designers and manufacturers have notoffered golf club heads with high moments of inertia for improvedforgiveness and low center-of-gravity for playing a ball positioned onturf.

Additionally, due to the nature of fairway wood shots, most such shotsare impacted below the center of the face. For traditionally designedfairway woods, this means that ballspeed and ball launch parameters areless than ideal. A continual challenge to improving performance infairway woods and hybrid clubs is the limitation in generatingballspeed. In addition to the center of gravity and center of gravityprojection, the geometry of the face and clubhead play a major role indetermining initial ball velocity.

SUMMARY

This application discloses, among other innovations, fairway wood-typegolf club heads that provide improved forgiveness, ballspeed, andplayability while maintaining durability.

The following describes golf club heads that include a body defining aninterior cavity, a sole portion positioned at a bottom portion of thegolf club head, a crown portion positioned at a top portion, and a skirtportion positioned around a periphery between the sole and crown. Thebody also has a forward portion and a rearward portion and a maximumabove ground height.

Golf club heads according to a first aspect have a body height less thanabout 46 mm and a crown thickness less than about 0.65 mm throughoutmore than about 70% of the crown. The above ground center-of-gravitylocation, Zup, is less than about 19 mm and a moment of inertia about acenter-of-gravity z-axis, I_(zz), is greater than about 300 kg-mm².

Some club heads according to the first aspect provide an above groundcenter-of-gravity location, Zup, less than about 16 mm. Some have a loftangle greater than about 13 degrees. A moment of inertia about a golfclub head center-of-gravity x-axis, I_(xx), can be greater than about170 kg-mm². A golf club head volume can be less than about 240 cm³. Afront to back depth (D_(ch)) of the club head can be greater than about85 mm.

Golf club heads according to a second aspect have a body height lessthan about 46 mm and the face has a loft angle greater than about 13degrees. An above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, is less thanabout 19 mm, and satisfies, together with a moment of inertia about acenter-of-gravity z-axis, I_(zz), the relationship I_(zz)≥13·Zup+105 .

According to the second aspect, the above ground center-of-gravitylocation, Zup, can be less than about 16 mm. The volume of the golf clubhead can be less than about 240 cm³. A front to back depth (D_(ch)) ofthe club head can be greater than about 85 mm. The crown can have athickness less than about 0.65 mm over at least about 70% of the crown.

According to a third aspect, the crown has a thickness less than about0.65 mm for at least about 70% of the crown, the golf club head has afront to back depth (D_(ch)) greater than about 85 mm, and an aboveground center-of-gravity location, Zup, is less than about 19 mm. Amoment of inertia about a center-of-gravity z-axis, I_(zz), specified inunits of kg-mm², a moment of inertia about a center-of-gravity x-axis,I_(xx), specified in units of kg-mm², and, the above groundcenter-of-gravity location, Zup, specified in units of millimeters,together satisfy the relationship I_(xx)+I_(zz)≥20·Zup+165 .

In some instances, the above ground center-of-gravity above groundlocation, Zup, and the moment of inertia about the center-of-gravityz-axis, I_(zz), specified in units of kg-mm², together satisfy therelationship I_(zz)≥13·Zup+105. In some embodiments, the moment ofinertia about the center-of-gravity z-axis, I_(zz), exceeds one or moreof 300 kg-mm², 320 kg-mm², 340 kg-mm², and 360 kg-mm². The moment ofinertia about the center-of-gravity x-axis, I_(xx), can exceed one ormore of 150 kg-mm², 170 kg-mm², and 190 kg-mm².

Some golf club heads according to the third aspect also include one ormore weight ports formed in the body and at least one weight configuredto be retained at least partially within one of the one or more weightports. The face can have a loft angle in excess of about 13 degrees. Thegolf club head can have a volume less than about 240 cm³. The body canbe substantially formed from a steel alloy, a titanium alloy, agraphitic composite, and/or a combination thereof. In some instances,the body is substantially formed as an investment casting. In someinstances, the maximum height is less than one or more of about 46 mm,about 42 mm, and about 38 mm.

In golf club heads according to a fourth aspect, the crown has athickness less than about 0.65 mm for at least about 70% of the crown, afront to back depth (D_(ch)) is greater than about 85 mm, and an aboveground center-of-gravity location, Zup, is less than about 19 mm. Inaddition, a moment of inertia about a center-of-gravity x-axis, I_(xx),specified in units of kg-mm², and the above ground center-of-gravitylocation, Zup, specified in units of millimeters, together satisfy therelationship I_(xx)≥7·Zup+60 .

In some instances, the above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, andthe moment of inertia about the center-of-gravity z-axis, I_(zz),specified in units of kg-mm², together satisfy the relationshipI_(zz)≥13·Zup+105.

The moment of inertia about the center-of-gravity z-axis, I_(zz), canexceed one or more of 300 kg-mm², 320 kg-mm², 340 kg-mm², and 360kg-mm². The moment of inertia about the center-of-gravity x-axis,I_(xx), can exceed one or more of 150 kg-mm², 170 kg-mm², and 190kg-mm².

Some embodiments according to the fourth aspect also include one or moreweight ports formed in the body and at least one weight configured to beretained at least partially within one of the one or more weight ports.

According to the fourth aspect, the face can have a loft angle in excessof about 13 degrees. The golf club head can have a volume less thanabout 240 cm³. The body can be substantially formed from a selectedmaterial from a steel alloy, a titanium alloy, a graphitic composite,and/or a combination thereof. In some instances, the body issubstantially formed as an investment casting. The maximum height ofsome club heads according to the fourth aspect is less than one or moreof about 46 mm, about 42 mm, and about 38 mm.

In golf club heads according to a fifth aspect, the club head has acenter of gravity projection (CG projection) on the striking surface ofthe club head that is located near to the center of the strikingsurface. In some instances, the center of gravity projection is at orbelow the center of the striking surface. For example, in someembodiments, the center of gravity projection on the striking surface isless than about 2.0 mm (i.e., the CG projection is below about 2.0 mmabove the center of the striking surface), such as less than about 1.0mm, or less than about 0 mm, or less than about −1.0 mm.

In some instances, the CG projection is related to the loft of the golfclub head. For example, in some embodiments, the golf club head has a CGprojection of about 3 mm or less for club heads where the loft angle isat least 16.2 degrees, and the CG projection is less than about 1.0 mmfor club heads where the loft angle is 16.2 degrees or less.

In golf club heads according to a sixth aspect, the club head has achannel, a slot, or other member that increases or enhances theperimeter flexibility of the striking face of the golf club head inorder to increase the coefficient of restitution and/or characteristictime of the golf club head. In some instances, the channel, slot, orother mechanism is located in the forward portion of the sole of theclub head, adjacent to or near to the forwardmost edge of the sole.

The foregoing and other features and advantages of the golf club headwill become more apparent from the following detailed description, whichproceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a top plan view of one embodiment of a golf club head.

FIG. 2 is a side elevation view from a toe side of the golf club head ofFIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a front elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 is a bottom perspective view of the golf club head of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the golf club head of FIG. 1 takenalong line 5-5 of FIG. 2 and showing internal features of the embodimentof FIG. 1.

FIG. 6 is a top plan view of the golf club head of FIG. 1, similar toFIG. 1, showing a golf club head origin system and a center-of-gravitycoordinate system.

FIG. 7 is a side elevation view from the toe side of the golf club headof FIG. 1 showing the golf club head origin system and thecenter-of-gravity coordinate system.

FIG. 8 is a front elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 1,similar to FIG. 3, showing the golf club head origin system and thecenter-of-gravity coordinate system.

FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of the golf club head of FIG. 1 takenalong line 9-9 of FIG. 3 showing internal features of the golf clubhead.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of an investment casting process for club headsmade of an alloy of steel.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart of an investment casting process for club headsmade of an alloy of titanium.

FIG. 12A is a side sectional view in elevation of a golf club headhaving a channel formed in the sole and a mass pad positioned rearwardlyof the channel.

FIGS. 12B-E are side sectional views in elevation of golf club headshaving mass pads mounted to the sole in different configurations and insome cases, a channel formed in the sole.

FIG. 13A is a side elevation view of another embodiment of a golf clubhead.

FIG. 13B is a bottom perspective view from a heel side of the golf clubhead of FIG. 13A.

FIG. 13C is a bottom elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 13A.

FIG. 13D is a cross-sectional view from the heel side of the golf clubhead of FIG. 13A showing internal features of the embodiment of FIG.13A.

FIG. 13E is a cross-sectional view of the portion of the golf club headwithin the dashed circle labeled “E” in FIG. 13D.

FIG. 13F is another cross-sectional view of the portion of the golf clubhead within the dashed circle labeled “E” in FIG. 13D.

FIG. 13G is a cross-sectional view from the top of the golf club head ofFIG. 13A showing internal features of the embodiment of FIG. 13A.

FIG. 13H is a bottom perspective view from a heel side of the golf clubhead of FIG. 13A, showing a weight in relation to a weight port.

FIG. 14A is a side elevation view of another embodiment of a golf clubhead.

FIG. 14B is a bottom perspective view from a heel side of the golf clubhead of FIG. 14A.

FIG. 14C is a bottom elevation view of the golf club head of FIG. 14A.

FIG. 14D is a cross-sectional view from the heel side of the golf clubhead of FIG. 14A showing internal features of the embodiment of FIG.14A.

FIG. 14E is a cross-sectional view of the portion of the golf club headwithin the dashed circle labeled “E” in FIG. 14D.

FIG. 14F is another cross-sectional view of the portion of the golf clubhead within the dashed circle labeled “E” in FIG. 14D.

FIG. 14G is a cross-sectional view from the top of the golf club head ofFIG. 14A showing internal features of the embodiment of FIG. 14A.

FIG. 14H is a bottom perspective view from a heel side of the golf clubhead of FIG. 14A, showing a plurality of weights in relation to aplurality of weight ports.

FIG. 15A is a bottom elevation view of another embodiment of a golf clubhead.

FIG. 15B is a bottom perspective view from a heel side of the golf clubhead of

FIG. 15A, showing a plurality of weights in relation to a plurality ofweight ports.

FIG. 16A is a bottom elevation view of another embodiment of a golf clubhead.

FIG. 16B is a bottom elevation view of a portion of another embodimentof a golf club head.

FIG. 16C is a bottom elevation view of a portion of another embodimentof a golf club head.

FIG. 17 is a partial side sectional view in elevation of a golf clubhead showing added weight secured to the sole by welding.

FIG. 18 is a partial side sectional view in elevation of a golf clubhead showing added weight mechanically attached to the sole, e.g., withthreaded fasteners.

FIG. 19A is a cross-sectional view of a high density weight.

FIG. 19B is a cross-sectional view of the high density weight of FIG.19A having a thermal resistant coating.

FIG. 19C is a cross-sectional view of the high density weight of FIG.19A embedded within a wax pattern.

FIG. 19D is a cross-sectional view of the high density weight of FIG.19A co-cast within a golf club head.

FIG. 19E is a cross-sectional view of the high density weight of FIG.19A co-cast within a golf club head.

FIG. 20A is a plot of the a club head's center of gravity projection,measured in distance above the center of its face plate, versus the loftangle of the club head for a large collection of golf club heads ofdifferent manufacturers.

FIG. 20B is a plot of the a club head's center of gravity projection,measured in distance above the center of its face plate, versus the loftangle of the club head for several embodiments of the golf club headsdescribed herein.

FIG. 21A is a contour plot of a first golf club head having a highcoefficient of restitution (COR) approximately aligned with the centerof its striking face.

FIG. 21B is a contour plot of a second golf club head having a slightlylower COR and a highest COR zone that is not aligned with the center ofits striking face.

FIG. 22A is a contour plot of the first golf club head having a highresulting ball speed area that is approximately aligned with the centerof the striking face.

FIG. 22B is a contour plot of the second golf club head having aslightly lower high resulting ball speed area that is not aligned withthe center of the striking face.

FIG. 23 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a golf club head having aremovable shaft, in accordance with another embodiment.

FIG. 24 shows the golf club head of FIG. 23 with the screw loosened topermit removal of the shaft from the club head.

FIG. 25 is a perspective view of the shaft sleeve of the assembly shownin FIG. 23.

FIG. 26 is a side elevation view of the shaft sleeve of FIG. 25.

FIG. 27 is a bottom plan view of the shaft sleeve of FIG. 25.

FIG. 28 is a cross-sectional view of the shaft sleeve taken along line28-28 of FIG. 27.

FIG. 29 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of a shaftsleeve.

FIG. 30 is a top plan view of a hosel insert that is adapted to receivethe shaft sleeve.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following describes embodiments of golf club heads for metalwoodtype golf clubs, including drivers, fairway woods, rescue clubs, hybridclubs, and the like. Several of the golf club heads incorporate featuresthat provide the golf club heads and/or golf clubs with increasedmoments of inertia and low centers of gravity, centers of gravitylocated in preferable locations, improved club head and face geometries,increased sole and lower face flexibility, higher coefficients orrestitution (“COR”) and characteristic times (“CT”), and/or decreasedbackspin rates relative to fairway wood and other golf club heads thathave come before.

The following makes reference to the accompanying drawings which form apart hereof, wherein like numerals designate like parts throughout. Thedrawings illustrate specific embodiments, but other embodiments may beformed and structural changes may be made without departing from theintended scope of this disclosure. Directions and references (e.g., up,down, top, bottom, left, right, rearward, forward, heelward, toeward,etc.) may be used to facilitate discussion of the drawings but are notintended to be limiting. For example, certain terms may be used such as“up,” “down,”, “upper,” “lower,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “left,”“right,” and the like. These terms are used, where applicable, toprovide some clarity of description when dealing with relativerelationships, particularly with respect to the illustrated embodiments.Such terms are not, however, intended to imply absolute relationships,positions, and/or orientations. For example, with respect to an object,an “upper” surface can become a “lower” surface simply by turning theobject over. Nevertheless, it is still the same object.

Accordingly, the following detailed description shall not to beconstrued in a limiting sense and the scope of property rights soughtshall be defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Normal Address Position

Club heads and many of their physical characteristics disclosed hereinwill be described using “normal address position” as the club headreference position, unless otherwise indicated.

FIGS. 1-3 illustrate one embodiment of a fairway wood type golf clubhead at normal address position. FIG. 1 illustrates a top plan view ofthe club head 2, FIG. 2 illustrates a side elevation view from the toeside of the club head 2, and FIG. 3 illustrates a front elevation view.By way of preliminary description, the club head 2 includes a hosel 20and a ball striking club face 18. At normal address position, the clubhead 2 rests on the ground plane 17, a plane parallel to the ground.

As used herein, “normal address position” means the club head positionwherein a vector normal to the club face 18 substantially lies in afirst vertical plane (i.e., a vertical plane is perpendicular to theground plane 17), the centerline axis 21 of the club shaft substantiallylies in a second vertical plane, and the first vertical plane and thesecond vertical plane substantially perpendicularly intersect.

Club Head

A fairway wood-type golf club head, such as the golf club head 2,includes a hollow body 10 defining a crown portion 12, a sole portion 14and a skirt portion 16. A striking face, or face portion, 18 attaches tothe body 10. The body 10 can include a hosel 20, which defines a hoselbore 24 adapted to receive a golf club shaft. The body 10 furtherincludes a heel portion 26, a toe portion 28, a front portion 30, and arear portion 32.

The club head 2 also has a volume, typically measured incubic-centimeters (cm³), equal to the volumetric displacement of theclub head 2, assuming any apertures are sealed by a substantially planarsurface. (See United States Golf Association “Procedure for Measuringthe Club Head Size of Wood Clubs,” Revision 1.0, Nov. 21, 2003). In someimplementations, the golf club head 2 has a volume between approximately120 cm³ and approximately 240 cm³, such as between approximately 180 cm³and approximately 210 cm³, and a total mass between approximately 185 gand approximately 245 g, such as between approximately 200 g andapproximately 220 g. In a specific implementation, the golf club head 2has a volume of approximately 181 cm³ and a total mass of approximately216 g. Additional specific implementations having additional specificvalues for volume and mass are described elsewhere herein.

As used herein, “crown” means an upper portion of the club head above aperipheral outline 34 of the club head as viewed from a top-downdirection and rearward of the topmost portion of a ball striking surface22 of the striking face 18 (see e.g., FIGS. 1-2). FIG. 9 illustrates across-sectional view of the golf club head of FIG. 1 taken along line9-9 of FIG. 3 showing internal features of the golf club head.Particularly, the crown 12 ranges in thickness from about 0.76 mm orabout 0.80 mm at the front crown 901, near the club face 18, to about0.60 mm at the back crown 905, a portion of the crown near the rear ofthe club head 2.

As used herein, “sole” means a lower portion of the club head 2extending upwards from a lowest point of the club head when the clubhead is at normal address position. In some implementations, the sole 14extends approximately 50% to 60% of the distance from the lowest pointof the club head to the crown 12, which in some instances, can beapproximately 10 mm and 12 mm for a fairway wood. For example, FIG. 5illustrates a sole blend zone 504 that transitions from the sole 14 tothe front sole 506. In the illustrated embodiment, the front sole 506dimension extends about 15 mm rearward of the club face 18.

In other implementations, the sole 14 extends upwardly from the lowestpoint of the golf club body 10 a shorter distance than the sole 14 ofgolf club head 2. Further, the sole 14 can define a substantially flatportion extending substantially horizontally relative to the ground 17when in normal address position. In some implementations, the bottommostportion of the sole 14 extends substantially parallel to the ground 17between approximately 5% and approximately 70% of the depth (D_(ch)) ofthe golf club body 10.

In some implementations, an adjustable mechanism is provided on the sole14 to “decouple” the relationship between face angle and hosel/shaftloft, i.e., to allow for separate adjustment of square loft and faceangle of a golf club. For example, some embodiments of the golf clubhead 2 include an adjustable sole portion that can be adjusted relativeto the club head body 2 to raise and lower the rear end of the club headrelative to the ground. Further detail concerning the adjustable soleportion is provided in U.S. Patent Application Publication No.2011/0312347, which is incorporated herein by reference.

As used herein, “skirt” means a side portion of the club head 2 betweenthe crown 12 and the sole 14 that extends across a periphery 34 of theclub head, excluding the striking surface 22, from the toe portion 28,around the rear portion 32, to the heel portion 26.

As used herein, “striking surface” means a front or external surface ofthe striking face 18 configured to impact a golf ball (not shown). Inseveral embodiments, the striking face or face portion 18 can be astriking plate attached to the body 10 using conventional attachmenttechniques, such as welding, as will be described in more detail below.In some embodiments, the striking surface 22 can have a bulge and rollcurvature. For example, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the striking surface22 can have a bulge and roll each with a radius of approximately 254 mm.As illustrated by FIG. 9, the average face thickness 907 for theillustrated embodiment is in the range of from about 1.0 mm to about 4.5mm, such as between about 2.0 mm and about 2.2 mm.

The body 10 can be made from a metal alloy (e.g., an alloy of titanium,an alloy of steel, an alloy of aluminum, and/or an alloy of magnesium),a composite material, such as a graphitic composite, a ceramic material,or any combination thereof. The crown 12, sole 14, and skirt 16 can beintegrally formed using techniques such as molding, cold forming,casting, and/or forging and the striking face 18 can be attached to thecrown, sole and skirt by known means.

For example, the striking face 18 can be attached to the body 10 asdescribed in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0239575 and2004/0235584.

Referring to FIGS. 7 and 8, the ideal impact location 23 of the golfclub head 2 is disposed at the geometric center of the striking surface22. The ideal impact location 23 is typically defined as theintersection of the midpoints of a height (H_(ss)) and a width (W_(ss))of the striking surface 22. Both H_(ss) and W_(ss) are determined usingthe striking face curve (S_(ss)). The striking face curve is bounded onits periphery by all points where the face transitions from asubstantially uniform bulge radius (face heel-to-toe radius ofcurvature) and a substantially uniform roll radius (face crown-to-soleradius of curvature) to the body (see e.g., FIG. 8). In the illustratedexample, H_(ss) is the distance from the periphery proximate to the soleportion of S_(ss) to the periphery proximate to the crown portion ofS_(ss) measured in a vertical plane (perpendicular to ground) thatextends through the geometric center of the face (e.g., this plane issubstantially normal to the x-axis). Similarly, W_(ss) is the distancefrom the periphery proximate to the heel portion of S_(ss) to theperiphery proximate to the toe portion of S_(ss) measured in ahorizontal plane (e.g., substantially parallel to ground) that extendsthrough the geometric center of the face (e.g., this plane issubstantially normal to the z-axis). See USGA “Procedure for Measuringthe Flexibility of a Golf Clubhead,” Revision 2.0 for the methodology tomeasure the geometric center of the striking face. In someimplementations, the golf club head face, or striking surface, 22, has aheight (H_(ss)) between approximately 20 mm and approximately 45 mm, anda width (W_(ss)) between approximately 60 mm and approximately 120 mm.In one specific implementation, the striking surface 22 has a height(H_(ss)) of approximately 26 mm, width (W_(ss)) of approximately 71 mm,and total striking surface area of approximately 2050 mm². Additionalspecific implementations having additional specific values for strikingsurface height (H_(ss)), striking surface width (W_(ss)), and totalstriking surface area are described elsewhere herein. In someembodiments, the striking face 18 is made of a composite material suchas described in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0239575,2004/0235584, 2008/0146374, 2008/0149267, and 2009/0163291, which areincorporated herein by reference. In other embodiments, the strikingface 18 is made from a metal alloy (e.g., an alloy of titanium, steel,aluminum, and/or magnesium), ceramic material, or a combination ofcomposite, metal alloy, and/or ceramic materials. Examples of titaniumalloys include 3-2.5, 6-4, SP700, 15-3-3-3, 10-2-3, or other alpha/nearalpha, alpha-beta, and beta/near beta titanium alloys. Examples of steelalloys include 304, 410, 450, or 455 stainless steel.

When at normal address position, the club head 2 is disposed at alie-angle 19 relative to the club shaft axis 21 and the club face has aloft angle 15 (FIG. 2). Referring to FIG. 3, lie-angle 19 refers to theangle between the centerline axis 21 of the club shaft and the groundplane 17 at normal address position. Lie angle for a fairway woodtypically ranges from about 54 degrees to about 62 degrees, mosttypically about 56 degrees to about 60 degrees. Referring to FIG. 2,loft-angle 15 refers to the angle between a tangent line 27 to the clubface 18 and a vector normal to the ground plane 29 at normal addressposition. Loft angle for a fairway wood is typically greater than about13 degrees. For example, loft for a fairway wood typically ranges fromabout 13 degrees to about 28 degrees, and more preferably from about 13degrees to about 22 degrees.

A club shaft is received within the hosel bore 24 and is aligned withthe centerline axis 21. In some embodiments, a connection assembly isprovided that allows the shaft to be easily disconnected from the clubhead 2. In still other embodiments, the connection assembly provides theability for the user to selectively adjust the loft-angle 15 and/orlie-angle 19 of the golf club. For example, in some embodiments, asleeve is mounted on a lower end portion of the shaft and is configuredto be inserted into the hosel bore 24. The sleeve has an upper portiondefining an upper opening that receives the lower end portion of theshaft, and a lower portion having a plurality of longitudinallyextending, angularly spaced external splines located below the shaft andadapted to mate with complimentary splines in the hosel opening 24. Thelower portion of the sleeve defines a longitudinally extending,internally threaded opening adapted to receive a screw for securing theshaft assembly to the club head 2 when the sleeve is inserted into thehosel opening 24. Further detail concerning the shaft connectionassembly is provided in U.S. Patent Application Publication No.2010/0197424, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Golf Club Head Coordinates

Referring to FIGS. 6-8, a club head origin coordinate system can bedefined such that the location of various features of the club head(including, e.g., a club head center-of-gravity (CG) 50) can bedetermined. A club head origin 60 is illustrated on the club head 2positioned at the ideal impact location 23, or geometric center, of thestriking surface 22.

The head origin coordinate system defined with respect to the headorigin 60 includes three axes: a z-axis 65 extending through the headorigin 60 in a generally vertical direction relative to the ground 17when the club head 2 is at normal address position; an x-axis 70extending through the head origin 60 in a toe-to-heel directiongenerally parallel to the striking surface 22, e.g., generallytangential to the striking surface 22 at the ideal impact location 23,and generally perpendicular to the z-axis 65; and a y-axis 75 extendingthrough the head origin 60 in a front-to-back direction and generallyperpendicular to the x-axis 70 and to the z-axis 65. The x-axis 70 andthe y-axis 75 both extend in generally horizontal directions relative tothe ground 17 when the club head 2 is at normal address position. Thex-axis 70 extends in a positive direction from the origin 60 to the heel26 of the club head 2. The y-axis 75 extends in a positive directionfrom the origin 60 towards the rear portion 32 of the club head 2. Thez-axis 65 extends in a positive direction from the origin 60 towards thecrown 12.

An alternative, above ground, club head coordinate system places theorigin 60 at the intersection of the z-axis 65 and the ground plane 17,providing positive z-axis coordinates for every club head feature.

As used herein, “Zup” means the CG z-axis location determined accordingto the above ground coordinate system. Zup generally refers to theheight of the CG 50 above the ground plane 17.

In several embodiments, the golf club head can have a CG with an x-axiscoordinate between approximately −2.0 mm and approximately 6.0 mm, suchas between approximately −2.0 mm and approximately 3.0 mm, a y-axiscoordinate between approximately 15 mm and approximately 40 mm, such asbetween approximately 20 mm and approximately 30 mm, or betweenapproximately 23 mm and approximately 28 mm, and a z-axis coordinatebetween approximately 0.0 mm and approximately −12.0 mm, such as betweenapproximately −3.0 mm and approximately −9.0 mm, or betweenapproximately −5.0 mm and approximately −8.0 mm. In certain embodiments,a z-axis coordinate between about 0.0 mm and about −12.0 mm provides aZup value of between approximately 10 mm and approximately 19 mm, suchas between approximately 11 mm and approximately 18 mm, or betweenapproximately 12 mm and approximately 16 mm. Referring to FIG. 1, in onespecific implementation, the CG x-axis coordinate is approximately 2.5mm, the CG y-axis coordinate is approximately 32 mm, the CG z-axiscoordinate is approximately −3.5 mm, providing a Zup value ofapproximately 15 mm. Additional specific implementations havingadditional specific values for the CG x-axis coordinate, CG y-axiscoordinate, CG z-axis coordinate, and Zup are described elsewhereherein.

Another alternative coordinate system uses the club headcenter-of-gravity (CG) 50 as the origin when the club head 2 is atnormal address position. Each center-of-gravity axis passes through theCG 50. For example, the CG x-axis 90 passes through thecenter-of-gravity 50 substantially parallel to the ground plane 17 andgenerally parallel to the origin x-axis 70 when the club head is atnormal address position. Similarly, the CG y-axis 95 passes through thecenter-of-gravity 50 substantially parallel to the ground plane 17 andgenerally parallel to the origin y-axis 75, and the CG z-axis 85 passesthrough the center-of-gravity 50 substantially perpendicular to theground plane 17 and generally parallel to the origin z-axis 65 when theclub head is at normal address position.

Mass Moments of Inertia

Referring to FIGS. 6-8, golf club head moments of inertia are typicallydefined about the three CG axes that extend through the golf club headcenter-of-gravity 50.

For example, a moment of inertia about the golf club head CG z-axis 85can be calculated by the following equation

Izz=∫(x ² +y ²)dm   (2)

where x is the distance from a golf club head CG yz-plane to aninfinitesimal mass, dm, and y is the distance from the golf club head CGxz-plane to the infinitesimal mass, dm. The golf club head CG yz-planeis a plane defined by the golf club head CG y-axis 95 and the golf clubhead CG z-axis 85.

The moment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) is an indication of theability of a golf club head to resist twisting about the CG z-axis.Greater moments of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) provide the golfclub head 2 with greater forgiveness on toe-ward or heel-ward off-centerimpacts with a golf ball. In other words, a golf ball hit by a golf clubhead on a location of the striking surface 18 between the toe 28 and theideal impact location 23 tends to cause the golf club head to twistrearwardly and the golf ball to draw (e.g., to have a curving trajectoryfrom right-to-left for a right-handed swing). Similarly, a golf ball hitby a golf club head on a location of the striking surface 18 between theheel 26 and the ideal impact location 23 causes the golf club head totwist forwardly and the golf ball to slice (e.g., to have a curvingtrajectory from left-to-right for a right-handed swing). Increasing themoment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) reduces forward or rearwardtwisting of the golf club head, reducing the negative effects of heel ortoe mis-hits.

A moment of inertia about the golf club head CG x-axis 90 can becalculated by the following equation

Ixx=∫(y ² +z ²)dm   (1)

where y is the distance from a golf club head CG xz-plane to aninfinitesimal mass, dm, and z is the distance from a golf club head CGxy-plane to the infinitesimal mass, dm. The golf club head CG xz-planeis a plane defined by the golf club head CG x-axis 90 and the golf clubhead CG z-axis 85. The CG xy-plane is a plane defined by the golf clubhead CG x-axis 90 and the golf club head CG y-axis 95.

As the moment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) is an indication ofthe ability of a golf club head to resist twisting about the CG z-axis,the moment of inertia about the CG x-axis (Ixx) is an indication of theability of the golf club head to resist twisting about the CG x-axis.Greater moments of inertia about the CG x-axis (Ixx) improve theforgiveness of the golf club head 2 on high and low off-center impactswith a golf ball. In other words, a golf ball hit by a golf club head ona location of the striking surface 18 above the ideal impact location 23causes the golf club head to twist upwardly and the golf ball to have ahigher trajectory than desired. Similarly, a golf ball hit by a golfclub head on a location of the striking surface 18 below the idealimpact location 23 causes the golf club head to twist downwardly and thegolf ball to have a lower trajectory than desired. Increasing the momentof inertia about the CG x-axis (Ixx) reduces upward and downwardtwisting of the golf club head 2, reducing the negative effects of highand low mis-hits.

Discretionary Mass

Desired club head mass moments of inertia, club head center-of-gravitylocations, and other mass properties of a golf club head can be attainedby distributing club head mass to particular locations. Discretionarymass generally refers to the mass of material that can be removed fromvarious structures providing mass that can be distributed elsewhere fortuning one or more mass moments of inertia and/or locating the club headcenter-of-gravity.

Club head walls provide one source of discretionary mass. In otherwords, a reduction in wall thickness reduces the wall mass and providesmass that can be distributed elsewhere. For example, in someimplementations, one or more walls of the club head can have a thickness(constant or average) less than approximately 0.7 mm, such as betweenabout 0.55 mm and about 0.65 mm. In some embodiments, the crown 12 canhave a thickness (constant or average) of approximately 0.60 mm orapproximately 0.65 mm throughout more than about 70% of the crown, withthe remaining portion of the crown 12 having a thickness (constant oraverage) of approximately 0.76 mm or approximately 0.80 mm. See forexample FIG. 9, which illustrates a back crown thickness 905 of about0.60 mm and a front crown thickness 901 of about 0.76 mm. In addition,the skirt 16 can have a similar thickness and the wall of the sole 14can have a thickness of between approximately 0.6 mm and approximately2.0 mm. In contrast, conventional club heads have crown wall thicknessesin excess of about 0.75 mm, and some in excess of about 0.85 mm.

Thin walls, particularly a thin crown 12, provide significantdiscretionary mass compared to conventional club heads. For example, aclub head 2 made from an alloy of steel can achieve about 4 grams ofdiscretionary mass for each 0.1 mm reduction in average crown thickness.Similarly, a club head 2 made from an alloy of titanium can achieveabout 2.5 grams of discretionary mass for each 0.1 mm reduction inaverage crown thickness. Discretionary mass achieved using a thin crown12, e.g., less than about 0.65 mm, can be used to tune one or more massmoments of inertia and/or center-of-gravity location.

For example, FIG. 5 illustrates a cross-section of the club head 2 ofFIG. 1 along line 5-5 of FIG. 2. In addition to providing a weight port40 for adjusting the club head mass distribution, the club head 2provides a mass pad 502 located rearward in the club head 2.

To achieve a thin wall on the club head body 10, such as a thin crown12, a club head body 10 can be formed from an alloy of steel or an alloyof titanium. Thin wall investment casting, such as gravity casting inair for alloys of steel (FIG. 10) and centrifugal casting in a vacuumchamber for alloys of titanium (FIG. 11), provides one method ofmanufacturing a club head body with one or more thin walls.

Referring to FIG. 10, a thin crown made of a steel alloy, for examplebetween about 0.55 mm and about 0.65 mm, can be attained by heating amolten steel (902) to between about 2520 degrees Fahrenheit and about2780 degrees Fahrenheit, such as about 2580 degrees. In addition, thecasting mold can be heated (904) to between about 660 degrees and about1020 degrees, such as about 830 degrees. The molten steel can be cast inthe mold (906) and subsequently cooled and/or heat treated (908). Thecast steel body 10 can be extracted from the mold (910) prior toapplying any secondary machining operations or attaching a striking face18.

Alternatively, a thin crown can be made from an alloy of titanium. Insome embodiments of a titanium casting process, modifying the gatingprovides improved flow of molten titanium, aiding in casting thincrowns. For further details concerning titanium casting, please refer toU.S. Pat. No. 7,513,296, incorporated herein by reference. Moltentitanium can be heated (1002) to between about 3000 degrees Fahrenheitand about 3750 degrees Fahrenheit, such as between about 3025 degreesFahrenheit and about 3075 degrees Fahrenheit. In addition, the castingmold can be heated (1006) to between about 620 degrees Fahrenheit andabout 930 degrees, such as about 720 degrees. The casting can be rotatedin a centrifuge (1004) at a rotational speed between about 200 RPM andabout 800 RPM, such as about 500 RPM. Molten titanium can be cast in themold (1010) and the cast body can be cooled and/or heat treated (1012).The cast titanium body 10 can be extracted from the mold (1014) prior toapplying secondary machining operations or attaching the striking face.

Weights and Weight Ports

Various approaches can be used for positioning discretionary mass withina golf club head. For example, many club heads have integral sole weightpads cast into the head at predetermined locations that can be used tolower, to move forward, to move rearward, or otherwise to adjust thelocation of the club head's center-of-gravity. Also, epoxy can be addedto the interior of the club head through the club head's hosel openingto obtain a desired weight distribution. Alternatively, weights formedof high-density materials can be attached to the sole, skirt, and otherparts of a club head. With such methods of distributing thediscretionary mass, installation is critical because the club headendures significant loads during impact with a golf ball that candislodge the weight. Accordingly, such weights are usually permanentlyattached to the club head and are limited to a fixed total mass, whichof course, permanently fixes the club head's center-of-gravity andmoments of inertia.

Alternatively, the golf club head 2 can define one or more weight ports40 formed in the body 10 that are configured to receive one or moreweights 80. For example, one or more weight ports can be disposed in thecrown 12, skirt 16 and/or sole 14. The weight port 40 can have any of anumber of various configurations to receive and retain any of a numberof weights or weight assemblies, such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos.7,407,447 and 7,419,441, which are incorporated herein by reference. Forexample, FIG. 9 illustrates a cross-sectional view that shows oneexample of the weight port 40 that provides the capability of a weight80 to be removably engageable with the sole 14. Other examples ofremovable weights 80 engageable with weight ports 40 are shown in, e.g.,FIGS. 13H, 14H, and 15B, which are described more fully below. In someembodiments, a single weight port 40 and engageable weight 80 isprovided, while in others, a plurality of weight ports 40 (e.g., two,three, four, or more) and engageable weights 80 are provided. Theillustrated weight port 40 defines internal threads 46 that correspondto external threads formed on the weight 80. Weights and/or weightassemblies configured for weight ports in the sole can vary in mass fromabout 0.5 grams to about 10 grams, or from about 0.5 grams to about 20grams.

Inclusion of one or more weights in the weight port(s) 40 provides acustomizable club head mass distribution, and corresponding mass momentsof inertia and center-of-gravity 50 locations. Adjusting the location ofthe weight port(s) 40 and the mass of the weights and/or weightassemblies provides various possible locations of center-of-gravity 50and various possible mass moments of inertia using the same club head 2.

As discussed in more detail below, in some embodiments, a playablefairway wood club head can have a low, rearward center-of-gravity.Placing one or more weight ports 40 and weights 80 rearward in the soleas shown, for example, in FIG. 9, helps desirably locate thecenter-of-gravity. In the foregoing embodiments, a center of gravity ofthe weight 80 is preferably located rearward of a midline of the golfclub head along the y-axis 75, such as, for example, within about 40 mmof the rear portion 32 of the club head, or within about 30 mm of therear portion 32 of the club head, or within about 20 mm of the rearportion of the club head. In other embodiments shown, for example, inFIGS. 13-16, a playable fairway wood club head can have acenter-of-gravity that is located to provide a preferablecenter-of-gravity projection on the striking surface 22 of the clubhead. In those embodiments, one or more weight ports 40 and weights 80are placed in the sole portion 14 forward of a midline of the golf clubhead along the y-axis 75. For example, in some embodiments, a center ofgravity of one or more weights 80 placed in the sole portion 14 of theclub head is located within about 30 mm of the nearest portion of theforward edge of the sole, such as within about 20 mm of the nearestportion of the forward edge of the sole, or within about 15 mm of thenearest portion of the forward edge of the sole, or within about 10 mmof the nearest portion of the forward edge of the sole. Although othermethods (e.g., using internal weights attached using epoxy or hot-meltglue) of adjusting the center-of-gravity can be used, use of a weightport and/or integrally molding a discretionary weight into the body 10of the club head reduces undesirable effects on the audible tone emittedduring impact with a golf ball.

Club Head Height and Length

In addition to redistributing mass within a particular club headenvelope as discussed immediately above, the club head center-of-gravitylocation 50 can also be tuned by modifying the club head externalenvelope. For example, the club head body 10 can be extended rearwardly,and the overall height can be reduced.

Referring now to FIG. 8, the club head 2 has a maximum club head height(H_(ch)) defined as the maximum above ground z-axis coordinate of theouter surface of the crown 12. Similarly, a maximum club head width(W_(ch)) can be defined as the distance between the maximum extents ofthe heel and toe portions 26, 28 of the body measured along an axisparallel to the x-axis when the club head 2 is at normal addressposition and a maximum club head depth (D_(ch)), or length, defined asthe distance between the forwardmost and rearwardmost points on thesurface of the body 10 measured along an axis parallel to the y-axiswhen the club head 2 is at normal address position. Generally, theheight and width of club head 2 should be measured according to the USGA“Procedure for Measuring the Clubhead Size of Wood Clubs” Revision 1.0.

In some embodiments, the fairway wood golf club head 2 has a height(H_(ch)) less than approximately 55 mm. In some embodiments, the clubhead 2 has a height (H_(ch)) less than about 50 mm. For example, someimplementations of the golf club head 2 have a height (H_(ch)) less thanabout 45 mm. In other implementations, the golf club head 2 has a height(H_(ch)) less than about 42 mm. Still other implementations of the golfclub head 2 have a height (H_(ch)) less than about 40 mm.

Some examples of the golf club head 2 have a depth (D_(ch)) greater thanapproximately 75 mm. In some embodiments, the club head 2 has a depth(D_(ch)) greater than about 85 mm. For example, some implementations ofthe golf club head 2 have a depth (D_(ch)) greater than about 95 mm. Inother implementations, as discussed in more detail below, the golf clubhead 2 can have a depth (D_(ch)) greater than about 100 mm.

Forgiveness of Fairway Woods

Golf club head “forgiveness” generally describes the ability of a clubhead to deliver a desirable golf ball trajectory despite a mis-hit(e.g., a ball struck at a location on the striking surface 22 other thanthe ideal impact location 23). As described above, large mass moments ofinertia contribute to the overall forgiveness of a golf club head. Inaddition, a low center-of-gravity improves forgiveness for golf clubheads used to strike a ball from the turf by giving a higher launchangle and a lower spin trajectory (which improves the distance of afairway wood golf shot). Providing a rearward center-of-gravity reducesthe likelihood of a slice or fade for many golfers. Accordingly,forgiveness of fairway wood club heads, such as the club head 2, can beimproved using the techniques described above to achieve high moments ofinertia and low center-of-gravity compared to conventional fairway woodgolf club heads.

For example, a club head 2 with a crown thickness less than about 0.65mm throughout at least about 70% of the crown can provide significantdiscretionary mass. A 0.60 mm thick crown can provide as much as about 8grams of discretionary mass compared to a 0.80 mm thick crown. The largediscretionary mass can be distributed to improve the mass moments ofinertia and desirably locate the club head center-of-gravity. Generally,discretionary mass should be located sole-ward rather than crown-ward tomaintain a low center-of-gravity, forward rather than rearward tomaintain a forwardly positioned center of gravity, and rearward ratherthan forward to maintain a rearwardly positioned center-of-gravity. Inaddition, discretionary mass should be located far from thecenter-of-gravity and near the perimeter of the club head to maintainhigh mass moments of inertia.

For example, in some of the embodiments described herein, acomparatively forgiving golf club head 2 for a fairway wood can combinean overall club head height (H_(ch)) of less than about 46 mm and anabove ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, less than about 19 mm.Some examples of the club head 2 provide an above groundcenter-of-gravity location, Zup, less than about 16 mm.

In addition, a thin crown 12 as described above provides sufficientdiscretionary mass to allow the club head 2 to have a volume less thanabout 240 cm³ and/or a front to back depth (D_(ch)) greater than about85 mm. Without a thin crown 12, a similarly sized golf club head wouldeither be overweight or would have an undesirably locatedcenter-of-gravity because less discretionary mass would be available totune the CG location.

In addition, in some embodiments of a comparatively forgiving golf clubhead 2, discretionary mass can be distributed to provide a mass momentof inertia about the CG z-axis 85, I_(zz), greater than about 300kg-mm². In some instances, the mass moment of inertia about the CGz-axis 85, I_(zz), can be greater than about 320 kg-mm², such as greaterthan about 340 kg-mm² or greater than about 360 kg-mm². Distribution ofthe discretionary mass can also provide a mass moment of inertia aboutthe CG x-axis 90, I_(xx), greater than about 150 kg-mm². In someinstances, the mass moment of inertia about the CG x-axis 85, I_(xx),can be greater than about 170 kg-mm², such as greater than about 190kg-mm².

Alternatively, some examples of a forgiving club head 2 combine an aboveground center-of-gravity location, Zup, less than about 19 mm and a highmoment of inertia about the CG z-axis 85, I_(zz). In such club heads,the moment of inertia about the CG z-axis 85, I_(zz), specified in unitsof kg-mm², together with the above ground center-of-gravity location,Zup, specified in units of millimeters (mm), can satisfy therelationship

I _(zz)≥13·Zup+105.

Alternatively, some forgiving fairway wood club heads have a moment ofinertia about the CG z-axis 85, I_(zz), and a moment of inertia aboutthe CG x-axis 90, I_(xx), specified in units of kg-mm², together with anabove ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, specified in units ofmillimeters, that satisfy the relationship

_(xx) +I _(zz)≥20·Zup+165.

As another alternative, a forgiving fairway wood club head can have amoment of inertia about the CG x-axis, I_(xx), specified in units ofkg-mm², and, an above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, specifiedin units of millimeters, that together satisfy the relationship

I _(xx)≥7·Zup+60.

Coefficient of Restitution and Center of Gravity Projection

Another parameter that contributes to the forgiveness and successfulplayability and desirable performance of a golf club is the coefficientof restitution (COR) of the golf club head. Upon impact with a golfball, the club head's face plate deflects and rebounds, therebyimparting energy to the struck golf ball. The club head's coefficient ofrestitution (COR) is the ratio of the velocity of separation to thevelocity of approach. A thin face plate generally will deflect more thana thick face plate. Thus, a properly constructed club with a thin,flexible face plate can impart a higher initial velocity to a golf ball,which is generally desirable, than a club with a thick, rigid faceplate. In order to maximize the moment of inertia (MOI) about the centerof gravity (CG) and achieve a high COR, it typically is desirable toincorporate thin walls and a thin face plate into the design of the clubhead. Thin walls afford the designers additional leeway in distributingclub head mass to achieve desired mass distribution, and a thinner faceplate may provide for a relatively higher COR.

Thus, thin walls are important to a club's performance. However, overlythin walls can adversely affect the club head's durability. Problemsalso arise from stresses distributed across the club head upon impactwith the golf ball, particularly at junctions of club head components,such as the junction of the face plate with other club head components(e.g., the sole, skirt, and crown). One prior solution has been toprovide a reinforced periphery about the face plate, such as by welding,in order to withstand the repeated impacts. Another approach to combatstresses at impact is to use one or more ribs extending substantiallyfrom the crown to the sole vertically, and in some instances extendingfrom the toe to the heel horizontally, across an inner surface of theface plate. These approaches tend to adversely affect club performancecharacteristics, e.g., diminishing the size of the sweet spot, and/orinhibiting design flexibility in both mass distribution and the facestructure of the club head. Thus, these club heads fail to provideoptimal MOI, CG, and/or COR parameters, and as a result, fail to providemuch forgiveness for off-center hits for all but the most expertgolfers.

In addition to the thickness of the face plate and the walls of the golfclub head, the location of the center of gravity also has a significanteffect on the COR of a golf club head. For example, a given golf clubhead having a given CG will have a projected center of gravity or“balance point” or “CG projection” that is determined by an imaginaryline passing through the CG and oriented normal to the striking face 18.The location where the imaginary line intersects the striking face 18 isthe CG projection, which is typically expressed as a distance above orbelow the center of the striking face 18. When the CG projection is wellabove the center of the face, impact efficiency, which is measured byCOR, is not maximized. It has been discovered that a fairway wood with arelatively lower CG projection or a CG projection located at or near theideal impact location on the striking surface of the club face, asdescribed more fully below, improves the impact efficiency of the golfclub head as well as initial ball speed. One important ball launchparameter, namely ball spin, is also improved.

The CG projection above centerface of a golf club head can be measureddirectly, or it can be calculated from several measurable properties ofthe club head. For example, using the measured value for the location ofthe center of gravity CG, one is able to measure the distance from theorigin to the CG along the Y-axis (CG_(y)) and the distance from theorigin along the Z-axis (CG_(z)). Using these values, and the loft angle15 (see FIG. 2) of the club, the CG projection above centerface isdetermined according to the following formula:

CG_projection=[CGy−CGz*Tan(Loft)]*Sin(Loft)+CGz/Cos(Loft)

The foregoing equation provides positive values where the CG projectionis located above the ideal impact location 23, and negative values wherethe CG projection is located below the ideal impact location 23.

Fairway wood shots typically involve impacts that occur below the centerof the face, so ball speed and launch parameters are often less thanideal. This results because most fairway wood shots are from the groundand not from a tee, and most golfers have a tendency to hit theirfairway wood ground shots low on the face of the club head. Maximum ballspeed is typically achieved when the ball is struck at the location onthe striking face where the COR is greatest.

For traditionally designed fairway woods, the location where the COR isgreatest is the same as the location of the CG projection on thestriking surface. This location, however, is generally higher on thestriking surface than the below center location of typical ball impactsduring play. For example, FIG. 20A shows a plot of the golf club head CGprojection, measured in distance above the center of its face plate,versus the loft angle of the club head for a large collection ofcommercially available fairway wood golf club heads of several golf clubmanufacturers. As shown in FIG. 20A, all of the commercially availablefairway wood golf club heads represented on the graph include a centerof gravity projection that is at least 1.0 mm above the center of theface of the golf club head, with most of these golf clubs including acenter of gravity projection that is 2.0 mm or more above the center ofthe face of the golf club head.

In contrast to these conventional golf clubs, it has been discoveredthat greater shot distance is achieved by configuring the club head tohave a CG projection that is located near to the center of the strikingsurface of the golf club head. Table 20B shows a plot of the golf clubhead CG projection versus the loft angle of the club head for severalembodiments of the inventive golf clubs described herein. In someembodiments, the golf club head 2 has a CG projection that is less thanabout 2.0 mm from the center of the striking surface of the golf clubhead, i.e., −2.0 mm<CG projection<2.0 mm. For example, someimplementations of the golf club head 2 have a CG projection that isless than about 1.0 mm from the center of the striking surface of thegolf club head (i.e., −1.0 mm<CG projection<1.0 mm), such as about 0.7mm or less from the center of the striking surface of the golf club head(i.e., −0.7 mm<CG projection<0.7 mm), or such as about 0.5 mm or lessfrom the center of the striking surface of the golf club head (i.e.,−0.5 mm<CG projection<0.5 mm).

In other embodiments, the golf club head 2 has a CG projection that isless than about 2.0 mm (i.e., the CG projection is below about 2.0 mmabove the center of the striking surface), such as less than about 1.0mm (i.e., the CG projection is below about 1.0 mm above the center ofthe striking surface), or less than about 0.0 mm (i.e., the CGprojection is below the center of the striking surface), or less thanabout −1.0 mm (i.e., the CG projection is below about 1.0 mm below thecenter of the striking surface). In each of these embodiments, the CGprojection is located above the bottom of the striking surface.

In still other embodiments, an optimal location of the CG projection isrelated to the loft 15 of the golf club head. For example, in someembodiments, the golf club head 2 has a CG projection of about 3 mm orless above the center of the striking surface for club heads where theloft angle is at least 15.8 degrees. Similarly, greater shot distance isachieved if the CG projection is about 1.4 mm or less above the centerof the striking surface for club heads where the loft angle is less than15.8 degrees. In still other embodiments, the golf club head 2 has a CGprojection that is below about 3 mm above the center of the strikingsurface for club heads where the loft angle 15 is more than about 16.2degrees, and has a CG projection that is below about 2.0 mm above thecenter of the striking surface for club heads where the loft angle 15 is16.2 degrees or less. In still other embodiments, the golf club head 2has a CG projection that is below about 3 mm above the center of thestriking surface for golf club heads where the loft angle 15 is morethan about 16.2 degrees, and has a CG projection that is below about 1.0mm above the center of the striking surface for club heads where theloft angle 15 is 16.2 degrees or less. In still other embodiments, thegolf club head 2 has a CG projection that is below about 3 mm above thecenter of the striking surface for golf club heads where the loft angle15 is more than about 16.2 degrees, and has a CG projection that isbelow about 1.0 mm above the center of the striking surface for clubheads where the loft angle 15 is between about 14.5 degrees and about16.2 degrees. In all of the foregoing embodiments, the CG projection islocated above the bottom of the striking surface. Further, greaterinitial ball speeds and lower backspin rates are achieved with the lowerCG projections.

For otherwise similar golf club heads, it was found that locating the CGprojection nearer to the center of the striking surface increases theCOR of the golf club head as well as the ball speed values for ballsstruck by the golf club head. For example, FIG. 21A is a contour plot ofCOR values for a high COR fairway wood golf club head 180 having its CGprojection near the center of the striking surface. Specifically, the CGprojection is 2 mm below (−2 mm in the z direction) the center of theface and 2 mm toward the heel from the center of the face (+2 mm in thex direction). The golf club head 180 has a loft of 16 degrees. Thecontour plot was constructed from 17 individual data points with thecurves being fit to show regions having the same COR values. The areademarcated by the 0.82 COR line includes the point 0 mm, 0 mm, which isthe center of the striking face, Thus, the highest COR region isapproximately aligned with the center of the striking face of the golfclub head 180. The highest COR value for the golf club head 180 is0.825. Also, the area demarcated by the 0.81 COR line is large and showsthat satisfactorily high COR is achieved over a sizable portion of thestriking face.

FIG. 21B is a contour plot similar to FIG. 21A, except showing CORvalues for a comparative example high COR fairway wood golf club head182. For the comparative example fairway wood golf club head 182, the CGprojection is 7 mm above center (+7 mm in the z direction) and 10 mmtoward the heel (+10 mm in the x direction). The comparative examplegolf club head 182 also has a loft of 16 degrees. By comparison to FIG.21A, it can be seen that the center of the striking face (0 mm, 0 mm)for the comparative example golf club head 182 is not within the highestCOR region, which means this desirable area of the striking face will beunderutilized.

FIG. 22A is a contour plot for the same golf club head 180 discussedabove in relation to FIG. 21A, showing ball speed values for ballsstruck by the golf club head in the region of the center of the strikingface. Nine points were used to generate the curves of FIGS. 22A and 22B.A maximum ball speed of 154.5 mph is achieved at a point within the 154mph contour line, which as seen in FIG. 22A desirably contains the 0 mm,0 mm center point.

FIG. 22B is similar to FIG. 22A, but shows ball speed for balls struckby the comparative example golf club head 182 discussed above inrelation to FIG. 21B. A maximum ball speed of 151.8 mph is achieved, butonly in a region that is spaced away from the center of the face.Comparing FIG. 22A to FIG. 22B, the golf club head 180 yields higherball speeds and has a larger sweet spot than the golf club head 182. Ifthe comparative example golf club head 182 is struck on center, which istypically the golfer's goal, the golfer will miss out on the portion ofthe striking surface that can generate the highest ball speed.

Increased Striking Face Flexibility

It is known that the coefficient of restitution (COR) of a golf club maybe increased by increasing the height H_(ss) of the striking face 18and/or by decreasing the thickness of the striking face 18 of a golfclub head 2. However, in the case of a fairway wood, hybrid, or rescuegolf club, increasing the face height may be considered undesirablebecause doing so will potentially cause an undesirable change to themass properties of the golf club (e.g., center of gravity location) andto the golf club's appearance.

FIGS. 12-18 show golf club heads that provide increased COR byincreasing or enhancing the perimeter flexibility of the striking face18 of the golf club without necessarily increasing the height ordecreasing the thickness of the striking face 18. For example, FIG. 12Ais a side sectional view in elevation of a club head 200 a having a highCOR. Near the face plate 18, a channel 212 a is formed in the sole 14. Amass pad 210 a is separated from and positioned rearward of the channel212 a. The channel 212 a has a substantial height (or depth), e.g., atleast 20% of the club head height, H_(CH), such as, for example, atleast about 23%, or at least about 25%, or at least about 28% of theclub head height H_(CH). In the illustrated embodiment, the height ofthe channel 212 a is about 30% of the club head height. In addition, thechannel 212 a has a substantial dimension (or width) in the y direction.

As seen in FIG. 12A, the cross section of the channel 212 a is agenerally inverted V. In some embodiments, the mouth of the channel hasa width of from about 3 mm to about 11 mm, such as about 5 mm to about 9mm, such as about 7 mm in the Y direction (from the front to the rear)and has a length of from about 50 mm to about 110 mm, such as about 65mm to about 95 mm, such as about 80 mm in the X direction (from the heelto the toe). The front portion of the sole in which the channel isformed may have a thickness of about 1.25-2.3 mm, for example about1.4-1.8 mm. The configuration of the channel 212 a and its position nearthe face plate 18 allows the face plate to undergo more deformationwhile striking a ball than a comparable club head without the channel212 a, thereby increasing both COR and the speed of golf balls struck bythe golf club head. Too much deformation, however, can detract fromperformance. By positioning the mass pad 210 a rearward of the channel212 a, as shown in the embodiment shown in FIG. 12A, the deformation islocalized in the area of the channel, since the club head is muchstiffer in the area of the mass pad 210 a. As a result, the ball speedafter impact is greater for the club head 200 a than for a conventionalclub head, which results in a higher COR.

FIGS. 12B-12E are side sectional views in elevation similar to FIG. 12Aand showing several additional examples of club head configurations. Theillustrated golf club head designs were modeled using commerciallyavailable computer aided modeling and meshing software, such asPro/Engineer by Parametric Technology Corporation for modeling andHypermesh by Altair Engineering for meshing. The golf club head designswere analyzed using finite element analysis (FEA) software, such as thefinite element analysis features available with many commerciallyavailable computer aided design and modeling software programs, orstand-alone FEA software, such as the ABAQUS software suite by ABAQUS,Inc. Representative COR and stress values for the modeled golf clubheads were determined and allow for a qualitative comparison among theillustrated club head configurations.

In the club head 200 b embodiment shown in FIG. 12B, a mass pad 210 b ispositioned on the sole 14 and the resulting COR is the lowest of thefive club head configurations in FIGS. 12A-12E. In the club head 200 cembodiment shown in FIG. 12C, a mass pad 210 c that is larger than themass pad 210 b is positioned on the sole 14 in a more forward locationin the club head than the position of the mass pad 210 b in the FIG. 13Bembodiment. The resulting COR for the club head 200 c is higher than theCOR for the club head 200 b. By moving the mass forward, the CG is alsomoved forward. As a result, the projection of the CG on the strikingface 18 is moved downward, i.e., it is at a lower height, for the clubhead 200 c compared to the club head 200 b.

In the club head 200 d shown in FIG. 12D, the mass pad 210 d ispositioned forwardly, similar to the mass pad 210 c in the club head 200c shown in FIG. 12C. A channel or gap 212 d is located between a forwardedge of the mass pad 210 d and the surrounding material of the sole 14,e.g., because of the fit in some implementations between the added massand a channel in the sole, as is described below in greater detail. Theresulting COR in the club head 200 d is higher than the club head 200 bor 200 c.

In the club head 210 e shown in FIG. 12E, the club head 200 e has adedicated channel 212 e in the sole, similar to the channel 212 a in theclub head 200 a, except shorter in height. The resulting COR in the clubhead 200 d is higher than for the club head 200 c but lower than for theclub head 200 a. The maximum stress values created in the areas of thechannels 212 a and 212 e while striking a golf ball for the club heads210 a, 210 e are lower than for the club head 200 d, in part because thegeometry of the channels 212 a, 212 e is much smoother and with fewersharp corners than the channel 210 d, and because the channel 210 d hasa different configuration (it is defined by a thinner wall on theforward side and the mass pad on the rearward side).

Additional golf club head embodiments are shown in FIGS. 13A-H, 14A-H,15A-B, and 16A-C. Like the examples shown in FIGS. 12A-E, theillustrated golf club heads provide increased COR by increasing orenhancing the perimeter flexibility of the striking face 18 of the golfclub. For example, FIGS. 13A-H show a golf club head 2 that includes achannel 212 extending over a portion of the sole 14 of the golf clubhead 2 in the forward portion of the sole 14 adjacent to or near thestriking face 18. The location, shape, and size of the channel 212provides an increased or enhanced flexibility to the striking face 18,which leads to increased COR and characteristic time (“CT”).

Turning to FIGS. 13A-H, an embodiment of a golf club head 2 includes ahollow body 10 defining a crown portion 12, a sole portion 14, and askirt portion 16. A striking face 18 is provided on the forward-facingportion of the body 10. The body 10 can include a hosel 20, whichdefines a hosel bore 24 adapted to receive a golf club shaft. The body10 further includes a heel portion 26, toe portion 28, a front portion30, and a rear portion 32.

The club head 2 has a channel 212 located in a forward position of thesole 14, near or adjacent to the striking face 18. The channel 212extends into the interior of the club head body 10 and has an inverted“V” shape defined by a heel channel wall 214, a toe channel wall 216, arear channel wall 218, a front channel wall 220, and an upper channelwall 222. In the embodiment shown, the upper channel wall 222 issemi-circular in shape, defining an inner radius R_(gi) and outer radiusR_(go), extending between and joining the rear channel wall 218 andfront channel wall 220. In other embodiments, the upper channel wall 222may be square or another shape. In still other embodiments, the rearchannel wall 218 and front channel wall 220 simply intersect in theabsence of an upper channel wall 222.

The channel 212 has a length L_(g) along its heel-to-toe orientation, awidth W_(g) defined by the distance between the rear channel wall 218and the front channel wall 220, and a depth D_(g) defined by thedistance from the outer surface of the sole portion 14 at the mouth ofthe channel 212 to the uppermost extent of the upper channel wall 222.In the embodiment shown, the channel has a length L_(g) of from about 50mm to about 90 mm, or about 60 mm to about 80 mm. Alternatively, thelength L_(g) of the channel can be defined relative to the width of thestriking surface W_(ss). For example, in some embodiments, the length ofthe channel L_(g) is from about 80% to about 120%, or about 90% to about110%, or about 100% of the width of the striking surface W_(ss). In theembodiment shown, the channel width Wg at the mouth of the channel canbe from about 3.5 mm to about 8.0 mm, such as from about 4.5 mm to about6.5 mm, and the channel depth Dg can be from about 10 mm to about 13 mm.

The rear channel wall 218 and front channel wall 220 define a channelangle β therebetween. In some embodiments, the channel angle β can bebetween about 10° to about 30°, such as about 13° to about 28°, or about13° to about 22°. In some embodiments, the rear channel wall 218 extendssubstantially perpendicular to the ground plane when the club head 2 isin the normal address position, i.e., substantially parallel to thez-axis 65. In still other embodiments, the front channel wall 220defines a surface that is substantially parallel to the striking face18, i.e., the front channel wall 220 is inclined relative to a vectornormal to the ground plane (when the club head 2 is in the normaladdress position) by an angle that is within about ±5° of the loft angle15, such as within about ±3° of the loft angle 15, or within about ±1°of the loft angle 15.

In the embodiment shown, the heel channel wall 214, toe channel wall216, rear channel wall 218, and front channel wall 220 each have athickness 221 of from about 0.7 mm to about 1.5 mm, e.g., from about 0.8mm to about 1.3 mm, or from about 0.9 mm to about 1.1 mm. Also, in theembodiment shown, the upper channel wall outer radius R_(go) is fromabout 1.5 mm to about 2.5 mm, e.g., from about 1.8 mm to about 2.2 mm,and the upper channel wall inner radius R_(gi) is from about 0.8 mm toabout 1.2 mm, e.g., from about 0.9 mm to about 1.1 mm.

A weight port 40 is located on the sole portion 14 of the golf club head2, and is located adjacent to and rearward of the channel 212. Asdescribed previously in relation to FIG. 9, the weight port 40 can haveany of a number of various configurations to receive and retain any of anumber of weights or weight assemblies, such as described in U.S. Pat.Nos. 7,407,447 and 7,419,441, which are incorporated herein byreference. For example, FIGS. 13E-H show an example of a weight port 40that provides the capability of a weight 80 to be removably engageablewith the sole 14. The illustrated weight port 40 defines internalthreads 46 that correspond to external threads formed on the weight 80.Weights and/or weight assemblies configured for weight ports in the solecan vary in mass from about 0.5 grams to about 10 grams, or from about0.5 grams to about 20 grams. In an embodiment, the body 10 of the golfclub head shown in FIGS. 13A-H is constructed primarily of stainlesssteel (e.g., 304, 410, 450, or 455 stainless steel) and the golf clubhead 2 includes a single weight 80 having a mass of approximately 0.9 g.Inclusion of the weight 80 in the weight port 40 provides a customizableclub head mass distribution, and corresponding mass moments of inertiaand center-of-gravity 50 locations.

In the embodiment shown, the weight port 40 is located adjacent to andrearward of the rear channel wall 218. One or more mass pads 210 mayalso be located in a forward position on the sole 14 of the golf clubhead 2, continguous with both the rear channel wall 218 and the weightport 40, as shown. As discussed above, the configuration of the channel212 and its position near the face plate 18 allows the face plate toundergo more deformation while striking a ball than a comparable clubhead without the channel 212, thereby increasing both COR and the speedof golf balls struck by the golf club head. By positioning the mass pad210 rearward of the channel 212, the deformation is localized in thearea of the channel 212, since the club head is much stiffer in the areaof the mass pad 210. As a result, the ball speed after impact is greaterfor the club head having the channel 212 and mass pad 210 than for aconventional club head, which results in a higher COR.

Turning next to FIGS. 14A-H, another embodiment of a golf club head 2includes a hollow body 10 defining a crown portion 12, a sole portion14, and a skirt portion 16. A striking face 18 is provided on theforward-facing portion of the body 10. The body 10 can include a hosel20, which defines a hosel bore 24 adapted to receive a golf club shaft.The body 10 further includes a heel portion 26, toe portion 28, a frontportion 30, and a rear portion 32.

The club head 2 has a channel 212 located in a forward position of thesole 14, near or adjacent to the striking face 18. The channel 212extends into the interior of the club head body 10 and has an inverted“V” shape defined by a heel channel wall 214, a toe channel wall 216, arear channel wall 218, a front channel wall 220, and an upper channelwall 222. In the embodiment shown, the upper channel wall 222 issemi-circular in shape, defining an inner radius R_(gi) and outer radiusR_(go), extending between and joining the rear channel wall 218 andfront channel wall 220. In other embodiments, the upper channel wall 222may be square or another shape. In still other embodiments, the rearchannel wall 218 and front channel wall 220 simply intersect in theabsence of an upper channel wall 222.

The channel 212 has a length L_(g) along its heel-to-toe orientation, awidth W_(g) defined by the distance between the rear channel wall 218and the front channel wall 220, and a depth D_(g) defined by thedistance from the outer surface of the sole portion 14 at the mouth ofthe channel 212 to the uppermost extent of the upper channel wall 222.In the embodiment shown, the channel has a length L_(g) of from about 50mm to about 90 mm, or about 60 mm to about 80 mm. Alternatively, thelength L_(g) of the channel can be defined relative to the width of thestriking surface W_(ss). For example, in some embodiments, the length ofthe channel L_(g) is from about 80% to about 120%, or about 90% to about110%, or about 100% of the width of the striking surface W_(ss). In theembodiment shown, the channel width Wg at the mouth of the channel canbe from about 3.5 mm to about 8.0 mm, such as from about 4.5 mm to about6.5 mm, and the channel depth Dg can be from about 10 mm to about 13 mm.

The rear channel wall 218 and front channel wall 220 define a channelangle β therebetween. In some embodiments, the channel angle β can bebetween about 10° to about 40°, such as about 16° to about 34°, or about16° to about 30°. In some embodiments, the rear channel wall 218 extendssubstantially perpendicular to the ground plane when the club head 2 isin the normal address position, i.e., substantially parallel to thez-axis 65. In other embodiments, such as shown in FIGS. 14A-H, the rearchannel wall 218 is inclined toward the forward end of the club head byan angle of about 1° to about 30°, such as between about 5° to about25°, or about 10° to about 20°. In still other embodiments, the frontchannel wall 220 defines a surface that is substantially parallel to thestriking face 18, i.e., the front channel wall 220 is inclined relativeto a vector normal to the ground plane (when the club head 2 is in thenormal address position) by an angle that is within about ±5° of theloft angle 15, such as within about ±3° of the loft angle 15, or withinabout ±1° of the loft angle 15.In the embodiment shown, the heel channelwall 214, toe channel wall 216, rear channel wall 218, and front channelwall 220 each have a thickness of from about 0.7 mm to about 1.5 mm,e.g., from about 0.8 mm to about 1.3 mm, or from about 0.9 mm to about1.1 mm. Also, in the embodiment shown, the upper channel wall outerradius R_(go) is from about 1.5 mm to about 2.5 mm, e.g., from about 1.8mm to about 2.2 mm, and the upper channel wall inner radius R_(gi) isfrom about 0.8 mm to about 1.2 mm, e.g., from about 0.9 mm to about 1.1mm.

A plurality of weight ports 40—three are included in the embodimentshown—are located on the sole portion 14 of the golf club head 2, andare located adjacent to and rearward of the channel 212. As describedpreviously in relation to FIG. 9, the weight ports 40 can have any of anumber of various configurations to receive and retain any of a numberof weights or weight assemblies, such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos.7,407,447 and 7,419,441, which are incorporated herein by reference. Forexample, FIGS. 14A-H show examples of weight ports 40 that each providethe capability of a weight 80 to be removably engageable with the sole14. The illustrated weight ports each 40 define internal threads 46 thatcorrespond to external threads formed on the weights 80. Weights and/orweight assemblies configured for weight ports in the sole can vary inmass from about 0.5 grams to about 10 grams, or from about 0.5 grams toabout 20 grams. In an embodiment, the golf club head 2 shown in FIGS.14A-H has a body 10 formed primarily of a titanium alloy (e.g., 3-2.5,6-4, SP700, 15-3-3-3, 10-2-3, or other alpha/near alpha, alpha-beta, andbeta/near beta titanium alloys), and includes three tungsten weights 80each having a density of approximately 15 g/cc and a mass ofapproximately 18 g. Inclusion of the weights 80 in the weight ports 40provides a customizable club head mass distribution, and correspondingmass moments of inertia and center-of-gravity 50 locations.

In the embodiment shown, the weight ports 40 are located adjacent to andrearward of the rear channel wall 218. The weight ports 40 are separatedfrom the rear channel wall 218 by a distance of approximately 1 mm toabout 5 mm, such as about 1.5 mm to about 3 mm. As discussed above, theconfiguration of the channel 212 and its position near the face plate 18allows the face plate to undergo more deformation while striking a ballthan a comparable club head without the channel 212, thereby increasingboth COR and the speed of golf balls struck by the golf club head. As aresult, the ball speed after impact is greater for the club head havingthe channel 212 than for a conventional club head, which results in ahigher COR.

In FIGS. 15A-B and 16A-C, additional golf club head 2 embodimentsinclude a slot 312 formed in the sole 14, rather than the channel 212shown in FIGS. 13A-H and 14A-H. The slot 312 is located in a forwardposition of the sole 14, near or adjacent to the striking face 18. Forexample, in some embodiments a forwardmost portion of the forward edgeof the slot 312 is located within about 20 mm from the forward edge ofthe sole 14, such as within about 15 mm from the forward edge of thesole 14, or within about 10 mm from the forward edge of the sole 14, orwithin about 5 mm from the forward edge of the sole 14, or within about3 mm from the forward edge of the sole 14.

In some embodiments, the slot 312 has a substantially constant widthW_(g), and the slot 312 is defined by a radius of curvature for each ofthe forward edge and rearward edge of the slot 312. In some embodiments,the radius of curvature of the forward edge of the slot 312 issubstantially the same as the radius of curvature of the forward edge ofthe sole 14. In other embodiments, the radius of curvature of each ofthe forward and rearward edges of the slot 312 is from about 15 mm toabout 90 mm, such as from about 20 mm to about 70 mm, such as from about30 mm to about 60 mm. In still other embodiments, the slot width W_(g)changes at different locations along the length of the slot 312.

The slot 312 comprises an opening in the sole 14 that provides accessinto the interior cavity of the body 10 of the club head. As discussedabove, the configuration of the slot 312 and its position near the faceplate 18 allows the face plate to undergo more deformation whilestriking a ball than a comparable club head without the slot 312,thereby increasing both COR and the speed of golf balls struck by thegolf club head. In some embodiments, the slot 312 may be covered orfilled with a polymeric or other material to prevent grass, dirt,moisture, or other materials from entering the interior cavity of thebody 10 of the club head.

In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 15A-B, the slot 312 includes enlarged,rounded terminal ends 313 at both the toe and heel ends of the slot 312.The rounded terminal ends 313 reduce the stress incurred in the portionsof the club head near the terminal ends of the slot 312, therebyenhancing the flexibility and durability of the slot 312.

The slot 312 formed in the sole of the club head embodiment shown inFIGS. 15A-B has a length L_(g) along its heel-to-toe orientation, and asubstantially constant width W_(g). In some embodiments, the lengthL_(g) of the slot can range from about 25 mm to about 70 mm, such asfrom about 30 mm to about 60 mm, or from about 35 mm to about 50 mm.Alternatively, the length L_(g) of the slot can be defined relative tothe width of the striking surface W_(ss). For example, in someembodiments, the length L_(g) of the slot is from about 25% to about 95%of the width of the striking surface W_(ss), such as from about 40% toabout 70% of the width of the striking surface W_(ss). In the embodimentshown, the slot width W_(g) can be from about 1 mm to about 5 mm, suchas from about 2 mm to about 4 mm. In the illustrated embodiment, therounded terminal ends 313 of the slot defines a diameter of from about 2mm to about 4 mm.

In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 15A-B, the forward and rearward edgesof the slot 312 each define a radius of curvature, with each of theforward and rearward edges of the slot having a radius of curvature ofabout 65 mm. In the embodiment shown, the slot 312 has a width W_(g) ofabout 1.20 mm.

A plurality of weight ports 40—three are included in the embodimentshown—are located on the sole portion 14 of the golf club head 2. Acenter weight port is located between a toe-side weight port and aheel-side weight port and is located adjacent to and rearward of thechannel 312. As described previously in relation to FIG. 9, the weightports 40 can have any of a number of various configurations to receiveand retain any of a number of weights or weight assemblies, such asdescribed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,407,447 and 7,419,441, which areincorporated herein by reference. For example, FIGS. 15A-B show examplesof weight ports 40 that each provide the capability of a weight 80 to beremovably engageable with the sole 14. The illustrated weight ports each40 define internal threads 46 that correspond to external threads formedon the weights 80. Weights and/or weight assemblies configured forweight ports in the sole can vary in mass from about 0.5 grams to about10 grams, or from about 0.5 grams to about 20 grams. In an embodiment,the golf club head 2 shown in FIGS. 15A-B has a body 10 formed primarilyof a titanium alloy (e.g., 3-2.5, 6-4, SP700, 15-3-3-3, 10-2-3, or otheralpha/near alpha, alpha-beta, and beta/near beta titanium alloys), andincludes three tungsten weights 80 each having a density ofapproximately 15 g/cc and a mass of approximately 18 g. Inclusion of theweights 80 in the weight ports 40 provides a customizable club head massdistribution, and corresponding mass moments of inertia andcenter-of-gravity 50 locations.

In the embodiment shown, the weight ports 40 are located adjacent to andrearward of the rear channel wall 218. The weight ports 40 are separatedfrom the rear channel wall 218 by a distance of approximately 1 mm toabout 5 mm, such as about 1.5 mm to about 3 mm. As discussed above, theconfiguration of the channel 212 and its position near the face plate 18allows the face plate to undergo more deformation while striking a ballthan a comparable club head without the channel 212, thereby increasingboth COR and the speed of golf balls struck by the golf club head. As aresult, the ball speed after impact is greater for the club head havingthe channel 212 than for a conventional club head, which results in ahigher COR.

Three additional embodiments of golf club heads 2 each having a slot 312formed on the sole 14 near the face plate 18 are shown in FIGS. 16A-C.Each of these additional embodiments includes a slot 312 that does notinclude the enlarged, rounded terminal ends 313 of the FIG. 15A-Bembodiments, each instead having constant width, rounded terminal ends.In the embodiment shown in FIG. 16A, the slot 312 has a length Lg ofabout 56 mm, and a width Wg of about 3 mm. The forward edge of the slot312 is defined by a radius of curvature of about 53 mm, while therearward edge of the slot 312 is defined by a radius of curvature ofabout 50 mm. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 16B, the slot 312 has alength Lg of about 40 mm, and a width Wg of about 3 mm. The forward edgeof the slot 312 is defined by a radius of curvature of about 27 mm,while the rearward edge of the slot 312 is defined by a radius ofcurvature of about 24 mm. Finally, in the embodiment shown in FIG.

16C, the slot 312 has a length Lg of about 60.6 mm, and a width Wg ofabout 3 mm. The forward edge of the slot 312 is defined by a radius ofcurvature of about 69 mm, while the rearward edge of the slot 312 isdefined by a radius of curvature of about 66 mm.

Mass Pads and High Density Weights

In the implementations shown in FIGS. 12A-E, discretionary mass is addedto the golf club head on an interior side of the sole at a forwardlocation. Thus, this location for added discretionary mass, alone or inconjunction with other locations, produces playable golf club headconfigurations, in addition to the rearward sole location describedabove.

As described, desired discretionary mass can be added in the form of amass pad, such as the mass pad 502 (see FIG. 5) or the mass pads 210 a,210 b, 210 c, 210 d, or 210 e. FIGS. 17 and 18 show examples ofdifferent mass pad configurations. In FIG. 17, added mass 250 is securedto the outside of the sole 14 by one or more welds 252 in a mass padconfiguration similar to FIG. 12C. The welds 252 create a generallycontinuous interface between the added mass 250 and the surroundingmaterial of the sole 14. Specifically, the added mass is fitted into achannel 260 formed in the sole 14. In the illustrated implementation,the channel 260 has a cross section with a generally flat base 262 andsloping side surfaces 264, 266. In FIG. 17, it can be seen that thewelds 252 have united the added mass 250 with the sole 14 in the area ofthe sloping side surface 264 and the base 262. Although there is aregion along the sloping side surface 266 where no weld material ispresent, a substantial portion of that side surface closest to the outerside of the sole 14 is united with the added mass 250.

In FIG. 18, the added mass 250 is secured to the outside of the sole bymechanical fasteners, such as using one or more screws 254. As shown inFIG. 18, the screw 254, the tip or distal end of which is visible, hasbeen threaded through an aperture in the added mass 250, through anaperture in the base 262 of the channel 260 and through an attached boss256 projecting from its inner side. This mechanical mounting of theadded mass 250 to the sole 14, although sufficiently secure, does notresult in the added mass 250 being united with the sole 14 as acontinuous interface. As can be seen, there are gaps 258, 259 betweenthe added mass 250 and the sloping side surfaces 266, 264, respectively.In most cases, it is only the inner side of the added mass 250 and thebase 262 against which the added mass 250 is tightened that are incontinuous contact. Surprisingly, the flexible boundary provided by oneor both of the gaps 258, 259 between the added mass 250 and the sole 14results in a higher COR: the COR is about 0.819 for the relativelyflexible boundary club head of FIG. 18, which is higher than the COR ofabout 0.810 for the relatively inflexible boundary or continuousinterface of FIG. 17. Thus, the gap or gaps between the added mass 250and the adjacent sloping side surface 264 behave similar to a channel,such as the channels 212 a, 212 d and 212 e, and results in a higherCOR. It should be noted that the specific configuration shown in FIG. 18is just one example that yields a flexible boundary, and that it wouldbe possible to achieve the same desirable results with otherconfigurations that result in attachment of the mass pad to the solewith at least one surface of the mass pad that is not secured to anadjacent portion of the sole.

In alternative embodiments, a mass pad or other high density weight isadded to the body of a golf club by co-casting the weight into the golfclub head or a component of a club head. For example, a mass pad orother high density weight can be added to a golf club head by co-castingthe mass pad with the golf club head. In some embodiments, the masspad/high density weight is co-casted using a negative draft angle inorder to affix or secure the mass pad/high density weight within theclub head body. Moreover, in some embodiments, the surface of the masspad/high density weight is coated with a thermal resistant coating priorto casting. The thermal resistant coating on the surface of the weightacts as a thermal barrier between two dissimilar materials (i.e., thegolf club body material and the material of the high density weight),and prevents any reaction between the molten metal of the club head bodyand the weight material. The coating also promotes adhesion between themolten metal and the weight by improving wetting of the molten metal onthe surface of the weight.

For example, as shown in FIGS. 19A-E, a high density weight 250 isprovided for co-casting with a body 10 of a golf club head. The weight250 is formed of a material having a higher density than the materialused to form the body 10 of the golf club head. For example, in someembodiments, the weight 250 is formed of a tungsten-containing alloyhaving a density of from about 8 g/cc to about 19 g/cc. The weight 250is formed having a negative draft, i.e., at least a portion of theinterior region has a larger cross-section or projected area than thearea of the exterior region opening. In other embodiments, the weight250 is formed having a projection, such as a step, a ledge, a shoulder,a tab, or other member that causes the weight 250 to have across-section, a projected area, or a portion of the cross-section orprojected area that extends outward of the exterior region opening. Inthe embodiment shown in FIG. 19A, the weight 250 has an interior surface270 that has a larger projected area than the exterior surface 272,whereby at least one of the sides 274 defines a negative draft angle 276or taper relative to the normal axis of the weight 250.

The surface of the high density weight 250 is preferably coated with athermal resistant coating 280, as shown in FIG. 19B. Depending upon thetemperatures to be encountered during the casting process, the coating280 is preferably one that is capable of providing thermal resistanceover temperatures in the range of from about 500° C. to about 1700° C.The coating can contain multiple layers of materials, such as metallic,ceramics, oxides, carbides, graphite, organic, and polymer materials.For example, typical thermal barrier coatings contain up to threelayers: a metallic bond coat, a thermally grown oxide, and a ceramictopcoat. The ceramic topcoat is typically composed of yttria-stabilizedzirconia (YSZ) which is desirable for having very low conductivity whileremaining stable at nominal operating temperatures typically seen inapplications. This ceramic layer creates the largest thermal gradient ofthe thermal resistant coating and keeps the lower layers at a lowertemperature than the surface. An example of a suitable ceramic topcoatmaterial is one that contains about 92% zirconium oxide and about 8%yttrium oxide in its outer layer. In the embodiments shown, the thermalresistant coating 280 has a thickness of from about 0.1 mm to about 3.0mm.

As noted above, the thermal resistant coating 280 provides a thermalbarrier that prevents the materials contained in the high density weight250 (e.g., tungsten, iron, nickel, et al.) from reacting with thematerials contained in the club head body 10 (e.g., stainless steelalloys, carbon steel, titanium alloys, aluminum alloys, magnesiumalloys, copper alloys, or the like) during the co-casting process. Thesereactions may cause unwanted gaps or other defects to occur, which gapsor defects are inhibited or prevented by the thermal resistant coating280. In addition, the thermal coating 280 has been observed to improvethe wetting of the surface of the high density weight 250 by the moltenmetal of the club head body 10 during the co-casting process, therebyalso reducing the occurrence of gaps or other defects.

A method of co-casting the high density weight 250 and golf club head 10will be described with reference to FIGS. 19A-E. Although the method isshown and described in reference to making a golf club head 10 of ametal wood style golf club (e.g., a driver, fairway wood, etc.), themethod may also be practiced in the manufacture of an iron, wedge,putter, or other style golf club head. The method may also be adaptedfor use in the manufacture of other non-golf club related items. Turningfirst to FIG. 19A, a high density weight 250 is provided with one ormore sacrificial handle bars 282. The handle bar 282 is attached to orembedded within the high density weight 250 in a manner that retains theability to remove the handle bar from the high density weight 250 at alater point in the process, as described more fully below. The highdensity weight 250 is then coated with a single-layer or multiple-layerthermal resistant coating 280, as shown in FIG. 19B. Depending upon thematerial used to construct the handle bar 282, the handle bar 282 mayalso be coated with the thermal resistant coating 280.

Once coated with the thermal resistant coating 280, the high densityweight 250 is embedded in a wax pattern 290 used in an investmentcasting process. See FIG. 19C. The weight 250 is embedded in the waxpattern 290 in such a way that the handle bar 282 extends outward fromthe wax pattern 290 and the embedded weight 250. The wax pattern 290 andembedded weight 250 are then used to build a ceramic mold (not shown) inwhich the handle bar 282 is securely embedded, in a manner known tothose skilled in the investment casting art. The wax pattern 290 is thenmelted out of the ceramic mold in a dewaxing process. The molten metalof the golf club head 10 is then casted into the ceramic mold, where itsurrounds the embedded high density weight 250 and solidifies aftercooling. The ceramic shell is then removed to release the castedcomponents of the golf club head 10, still including the exposedsacrificial handle bar 282 extending from the high density weight 250,as shown in FIG. 19D. The handle bar 282 is then removed via a cuttingand/or polishing process, and the remaining portions of the golf clubhead 10 are attached according to the specifications described elsewhereherein, resulting in the finished golf club head shown in FIG. 19E.

The foregoing method may be adapted to include multiple high densityweights 250 into one golf club head 10 simultaneously. Moreover, inother embodiments, the high density weight 250 is placed in otherlocations within the mold or golf club head 10. Unlike other methods forinstalling high density weights or mass pads, there are no density ormechanical property constraints relating to the materials used for theweights, and no welding, deformation, or pressing of the weight(s) isrequired for installation. Moreover, the shape and size of the co-castedhigh density weight 250 may be varied to obtain desired results. Forexample, whereas the high density weight 250 shown in FIGS. 19A-Eincludes a generally trapezoidal cross-sectional shape, weights thatdefine a negative draft angle over at least a portion of the exteriorsurface using other alternative (i.e., non-trapezoidal) shapes are alsopossible.

Characteristic Time

A golf club head Characteristic Time (CT) can be described as anumerical characterization of the flexibility of a golf club headstriking face. The CT may also vary at points distant from the center ofthe striking face, but may not vary greater than approximately 20% ofthe CT as measured at the center of the striking face. The CT values forthe golf club heads described in the present application were calculatedbased on the method outlined in the USGA “Procedure for Measuring theFlexibility of a Golf Clubhead,” Revision 2.0, Mar. 25, 2005, which isincorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Specifically, themethod described in the sections entitled “3. Summary of Method,” “5.Testing Apparatus Set-up and Preparation,” “6. Club Preparation andMounting,” and “7. Club Testing” are exemplary sections that arerelevant. Specifically, the characteristic time is the time for thevelocity to rise from 5% of a maximum velocity to 95% of the maximumvelocity under the test set forth by the USGA as described above.

EXAMPLES 1 AND 2

Table 1 summarizes characteristics of two exemplary 3-wood club headsthat embody one or more of the above described aspects. In particular,the exemplary club heads achieve desirably low centers of gravity incombination with high mass moments of inertia.

EXAMPLE 1

Club heads formed according to the Example 1 embodiment are formedlargely of an alloy of steel. As indicated by Table 1 and depending onthe manufacturing tolerances achieved, the mass of club heads accordingto Example 1 is between about 210 g and about 220 grams and the Zupdimension is between about 13 mm and about 17 mm. As designed, the massof the Example 1 design is 216.1 g and the Zup dimension 15.2 mm. Theloft is about 16 degrees, the overall club head height is about 38 mm,and the head depth is about 87 mm. The crown is about 0.60 mm thick. Therelatively large head depth in combination with a thin and light crownprovides significant discretionary mass for redistribution to improveforgiveness and overall playability. For example, the resulting massmoment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) is about 325 kg-mm².

EXAMPLE 2

Club heads formed according to the Example 2 embodiment are formedlargely of an alloy of titanium. As indicated by Table 1 and dependingon the manufacturing tolerances achieved, the mass of club headsaccording to Example 2 is between about 210 g and about 220 grams andthe Zup dimension is between about 13 mm and about 17 mm. As designed,the mass of the Example 2 design is 213.8 g and the Zup dimension 14.8mm. The loft is about 15 degrees, the overall club head height is about40.9 mm, and the head depth is about 97.4 mm. The crown is about 0.80 mmthick. The relatively large head depth in combination with a thin andlight crown provides significant discretionary mass for redistributionto improve forgiveness and overall playability. For example, theresulting mass moment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) is about 302kg-mm².

OVERVIEW OF EXAMPLES 1 AND 2

Both of these examples provide improved playability compared toconventional fairway woods, in part by providing desirable combinationsof low CG position, e.g., a Zup dimension less than about 16 mm, andhigh moments of inertia, e.g., I_(zz) greater than about 300 kg-mm²,I_(xx) greater than about 170 kg-mm², and a shallow head height, e.g.,less than about 46 mm. Such examples are possible, in part, because theyincorporate an increased head depth, e.g., greater than about 85 mm, incombination with a thinner, lighter crown compared to conventionalfairway woods. These features provide significant discretionary mass forachieving desirable characteristics, such as, for example, high momentsof inertia and low CG.

TABLE 1 Exemplary Embodiment Units Example 1 Example 2 Mass g 216.1213.8 Volume cc 181.0 204.0 CGX mm 2.5 4.7 CGY mm 31.8 36.1 CGZ mm −3.54−4.72 Z Up mm 15.2 14.8 Loft ° 16 15 Lie ° 58.5 58.5 Face Height mm 26.330.6 Head Height mm 38 40.9 Face Thickness mm 2.00 2.30 Crown Thicknessmm 0.60 0.80 Sole Thickness mm 1.00 2.50

EXAMPLE 3

Referring to Table 2, golf club heads with added weight attachedmechanically to the sole (e.g., as in FIG. 18) showed higher COR valuesthan golf club heads having added weight attached to the sole by welding(e.g., as in FIG. 17). In Table 2, measurements of COR are given for thecenter of the club face and at four other locations, each spaced by 7.5mm from center of the club face along the horizontal and vertical axes.

TABLE 2 Distance of COR for club COR for club COR for measurement headwith mass head with mass comparable location from pad attached to padattached conventional center of club face sole by welding with screwsclub head 0 0.81 0.82 0.79 7.5 mm toward heel 0.80 0.80 0.78 7.5 mmtoward toe 0.80 0.81 0.78 7.5 mm toward crown 0.79 0.79 0.79 7.5 mmtoward sole 0.78 0.80 0.75

For a sample of five parts, the golf club heads having added weightattached by welding showed an average COR of 0.81 and an averagecharacteristic time (CT) of 241 μs. Also for a sample of five parts, theclub heads having added weight attached with screws had an average CORof 0.82 and an average CT of 252 μs.

Simulation results confirmed these empirical findings. In simulatedresults, a golf club head in which the added weight is mechanicallyattached, resulting in a flexible boundary, yielded a higher COR than agolf club head in which the added weight was welded to the sole withouta flexible boundary.

EXAMPLE A THROUGH J

As noted above, several of the illustrated golf club head designs weremodeled using commercially available computer aided modeling software.Table 3 below summarizes characteristics of several exemplary 3-woodclub heads that embody one or more of the above described aspects.

TABLE 3 Units Example A Example B Example C Example D Example E Mass g214 214 214 216 216.3 Volume cc 197 210 184 195 199 CGX mm 4.8 2.4 2.234 1.3 CGY mm 30.1 23.8 23.3 24.0 28.6 CGZ mm −8.9 −6.99 −6.6 −7.45 −7.91Z Up mm 12.7 14.5 14.9 14.1 13.6 Loft ° 16 16.8 17.3 15.4 16 Lie ° 57.556.5 56.8 58.5 58 Face Height mm 37.9 39.4 39.4 39.4 39.4 Head Height mm39.1 42.6 42.6 42.8 42.6 Head Depth mm 100.9 84.8 85.5 87.4 89.0 CGProjection mm −0.2 0.2 0.6 −0.8 0.3 Body Material SS Ti alloy Ti alloyTi alloy Ti alloy Channel/Slot N/A N/A N/A N/A FIG. 14 Units Example FExample G Example H Example I Example J Mass g 213.5 210.2 211 214.4214.5 Volume cc 191.2 206.2 203 192 192 CGX mm 2.54 0.84 1.9 2.1 2.3 CGYmm 21.4 25.7 22.3 21.8 21.7 CGZ mm −5.4 −7.29 −7.6 −5.52 −5.79 Z Up mm16.1 14.2 13.9 16 15.7 Loft ° 16 16 16 16 16 Lie ° 58 58 58 58 58 FaceHeight mm 39.4 39.4 39.4 39.4 39.4 Head Height mm 42.8 42.8 42.8 42.642.6 Head Depth mm 87.3 93.1 93.1 89.3 89.3 CG Projection mm 0.7 0.1−1.2 0.7 0.4 Body Material Steel Ti alloy Ti alloy SS SS Channel/SlotFIG. 13 FIG. 14 FIG. 15 FIG. 16B FIG. 16BAs shown in Table 3, Examples A through D describe embodiments of clubheads that do not include a slot or channel formed in the sole of theclub head. Examples E through J, on the other hand, each include a slotor channel of one of the types described above in relation to FIGS.13-16. Each of these exemplary club heads is included in the plot shownin FIG. 20B, which shows relationships between the club head CGprojection and the static loft of the inventive golf club headsdescribed herein.

EXAMPLE K THROUGH T

Several golf club head were constructed and analyzed. Table 4 belowsummarizes characteristics of several exemplary 3-wood club heads thatembody one or more of the above described aspects.

TABLE 4 Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- Units ple K ple L ple M ple N Mass g214.4 214.3 216.0 211.8 Volume cc 193.8 193.8 191.4 CGX mm 2.3 3.0 0.52.1 CGY mm 22.1 22.1 29.7 25.8 CGZ mm −5.4 −5.0 −8.0 −7.7 Z Up mm 16.216.6 13.6 13.9 Loft ° 16 16 14.8 16 Lie ° 58 58 58 58 Face Height mm35.2 35.2 36.0 Head Height mm 43 43 42.5 Head Depth mm 91.4 91.4 91.2 CGProjection mm 0.9 1.3 −0.1 −0.3 Body Material SS SS Ti Alloy Ti AlloyChannel/Slot FIG. 16B FIG. 16B FIG. 14 FIG. 14 Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam-Units ple O ple P ple Q ple R Mass g 210.9 214.4 216.2 220.1 Volume cc187.3 186.5 CGX mm −0.6 0.2 −1.5 −0.2 CGY mm 21.9 23.3 27.7 26.1 CGZ mm−7.1 −5.9 −7.8 −10.2 Z Up mm 13.4 14.3 15.2 13.5 Loft ° 15.2 15.1 15.816.1 Lie ° 58 58 57.5 59 Face Height mm 36.2 34.1 35.9 Head Height mm42.7 41.9 42.0 Head Depth mm 95.9 91.3 92.4 CG Projection mm −1.1 0.40.0 −2.6 Body Material Ti Alloy Ti Alloy Ti Alloy Ti Alloy Channel/SlotFIG. 15 FIG. 15 FIG. 17 FIG. 17As shown in Table 4, each of Examples K through T includes a slot orchannel of one of the types described above in relation to FIGS. 14-17.Each of these exemplary club heads is included in the plot shown in FIG.20B, which shows relationships between the club head CG projection andthe static loft of the inventive golf club heads described herein.

Sole Channel

The following study illustrates the effect of forming a channel in thesole near or adjacent to the face of a fairway wood golf club. Two golfclub heads having the general design shown in FIG. 12A were constructed.The body portions of the club heads were formed primarily of stainlesssteel (custom 450SS). The center face characteristic time (CT) andbalance point coefficient of restitution (COR) were measured on each ofthe two heads. The channel of each of the club heads were then filledwith DP420 epoxy adhesive (3M Corp.) and the same CT and CORmeasurements were repeated. Each head was measured three times beforeand three times after the epoxy adhesive was introduced into thechannel. The measurements are shown below in Table 5:

TABLE 5 Measurements w/o Epoxy Measurements with Epoxy Head Mass MassChange ID (g) CT COR (g) CT COR CT COR 44300 210 1 228 227 0.810 210 1221 219 0.805 −8 −0.005 2 226 2 219 3 228 3 218 44301 209.4 1 235 2330.808 209.4 1 224 223 0.803 −10 −0.005 2 232 2 223 3 232 3 222

From the information presented in Table 5 it is seen that the unfilledchannel produces a COR that is 0.005 higher than the filled channel forboth heads tested. Note that the mass was kept constant by placing leadtape on the sole of the heads when tested before the epoxy adhesive wasintroduced into the channel.

The epoxy adhesive is not a perfectly rigid material. For example, themodulus of elasticity of the DP420 epoxy adhesive is approximately 2.3GPa, as compared to the modulus of elasticity of the stainless steel(Custom 450SS), which is approximately 193 GPa. As a result, the filledchannel is still able to deflect during ball impact. This suggests thatthe increase in CT and COR due to the presence of the channel on thesole of the club head is even greater than illustrated by the datacontained in Table 5.

Sole Slot

The following study illustrates the effect of forming a curved slot inthe sole near or adjacent to the face of a fairway wood golf club. ABurner Superfast 2.0 fairway wood (3-15° was used in the study. Fiveclub heads were measured for center face characteristic time (CT) andbalance point coefficient of restitution (COR) both before and aftermachining a curved slot in the sole having the general design shown inFIGS. 15A-B. The results of the measurements are reported in Table 6below:

TABLE 6 Head Before Slot After Slot ID CT COR CT Change COR Change 43303195 0.787 218 23 0.802 0.015 43563 193 0.791 211 18 0.801 0.010 43678192 0.792 214 22 0.800 0.008 46193 194 0.792 217 23 0.804 0.012 46194196 0.793 219 23 0.802 0.009 Average 194 0.791 216 22 0.802 0.011

From the information presented in Table 6 it is seen that the club headshad an average CT increase of 22 and an average COR increase of 0.011after forming a curved slot in the sole of the club head. The slottedclub heads proved to be durable after being submitted to endurancetesting.

Additional COR testing was performed on Head ID 43563 from Table 6. Thetesting included measuring COR at several locations on the striking faceof the club head. The results are shown below in table 7.

TABLE 7 Measured COR Face Location Before Slot After Slot Change BalancePoint 0.791 0.800 0.015 10 mm sole 0.765 0.782 0.017 10 mm toe 0.7690.775 0.006 10 mm heel 0.767 0.766 −0.001 5 mm crown 0.783 0.788 0.005AVERAGE 0.775 0.782 0.007

From the information presented in Table 7 it is seen that there was anaverage COR increase of 0.007 for the locations measured. The mostsignificant increase of 0.017 COR points was at the low face location.This location is the nearest to the slot formed in the sole of the clubhead, and is therefore most influenced by the increased flexibility atthe boundary condition of the bottom of the face.

Comparison of Slot, Channel, and No Slot/No Channel Clubs

The following study provides a comparison of the performance of threegolf club heads having very similar properties, with one of the clubshaving a channel formed in the sole (e.g., the design shown in FIG.13A-H), a second having a slot formed in the sole (e.g., the designshown in FIG. 16B), and a third having no slot or channel. The clubheads were constructed of stainless steel (custom 450SS). The CORmeasurements for the three club heads are shown below in Table 8:

TABLE 8 Measured COR (change from No Slot/ COR Channel in brackets)Measurement No Slot/ Location No Channel Channel Slot Balance Point0.799 0.812 [0.013] 0.803 [0.004] Center Face 0.798 0.811 [0.013] 0.806[0.008] 0, 7.5 mm heel 0.792 0.808 [0.016] 0.796 [0.004] 0, 7.5 mm toe0.775 0.776 [0.001] 0.776 [0.001] 0, 7.5 mm sole 0.772 0.788 [0.016]0.793 [0.021] 0, 7.5 mm crown 0.770 0.775 [0.005] 0.759 [−0.011] AVERAGE 0.784 0.795 [0.011] 0.789 [0.005] Face thickness 1.90 mm 2.05 mm2.00 mm

As noted in Table 8, the face thickness of the sample club heads weredifferent, with the channel sole having the thickest face and theregular (no slot, no channel) sole having the thinnest face. It would beexpected that the thicker face of the club heads having a channel and aslot (relative to the no slot/no channel sole) would tend to cause themeasured COR to decrease relative to the measured COR of the No Slot/NoChannel sole. Accordingly, the data presented in Table 8 supports theconclusion that the channel and slot features formed in the identifiedclub heads provide additional sole flexibility leading to an increase inthe COR of the club head.

Player Testing

Player testing was conducted to compare the performance of the inventivegolf clubs to a current, commercially available golf club. Golf clubsaccording to Examples K and L were constructed and compared to aTaylorMade Burner Superfast 2.0 golf club. The head properties of thesethree golf clubs are presented in Table 9 below.

TABLE 9 Burner Units Superfast 2.0 Example K Example L Mass g 212.0214.4 214.3 Volume cc 194.1 193.8 193.8 Delta 1 mm −12.2 −8.9 −8.9 Delta2 mm 30.8 30.0 29.6 Delta 3 mm 60.0 56.6 55.9 CGX mm 1.4 2.3 3.0 CGY mm27.1 22.1 22.1 CGZ mm −4.1 −5.4 −5.0 Z Up mm 17.0 16.2 16.6 Loft ° 15.816 16 Lie ° 58 58 58 Face Height mm 34.4 35.2 35.2 Head Height mm 42.543 43 Head Depth mm 93.1 91.4 91.4 CG Projection mm 3.4 0.9 1.3 BodyMaterial SS SS SS Channel/Slot N/A FIG. 16B FIG. 16BThe information in Table 9 shows that the Example K and L clubs includea CG that is located significantly lower and forward in relation to theCG location of the Burner Superfast 2.0 golf club, thereby providing aCG projection that is significantly lower on the club face. The staticloft of the inventive club heads are approximately equal to that of theBurner Superfast 2.0 comparison club. Accordingly, changes in the spinand launch angle would be associated with differences in dynamic loft,which is verifiable by player testing.

Head-to-head player tests were conducted to compare the performance ofthe Burner Superfast 2.0 to the two inventive clubs listed in Table 9.The testing showed that the inventive golf clubs (Examples K and L)provided significantly more distance (carry and total), less backspin, alower peak trajectory, and higher initial ball speed relative to theBurner Superfast 2.0 fairway wood. All clubs had comparable initiallaunch angles, and both of the inventive golf clubs (Examples K and L)appeared to generate the same initial ball speed. In both tests, theExample K club head produced approximately 380 rpm less backspin, hadmore carry, and had more roll out distance than the Example L club head.

FIG. 23 shows another embodiment of a golf club assembly that has aremovable shaft that can be supported at various positions relative tothe head to vary the shaft loft and/or the lie angle of the club. Theassembly comprises a club head 3000 having a hosel 3002 defining a hoselopening 3004. The hosel opening 3004 is dimensioned to receive a shaftsleeve 3006, which in turn is secured to the lower end portion of ashaft 3008. The shaft sleeve 3006 can be adhesively bonded, welded orsecured in equivalent fashion to the lower end portion of the shaft3008. In other embodiments, the shaft sleeve 3006 can be integrallyformed with the shaft 3008. As shown, a ferrule 3010 can be disposed onthe shaft just above the shaft sleeve 3006 to provide a transition piecebetween the shaft sleeve and the outer surface of the shaft 3008.

The hosel opening 3004 is also adapted to receive a hosel insert 200(described in detail above), which can be positioned on an annularshoulder 3012 inside the club head. The hosel insert 200 can be securedin place by welding, an adhesive, or other suitable techniques.Alternatively, the insert can be integrally formed in the hosel opening.The club head 3000 further includes an opening 3014 in the bottom orsole of the club head that is sized to receive a screw 400. The screw400 is inserted into the opening 3014, through the opening in shoulder3012, and is tightened into the shaft sleeve 3006 to secure the shaft tothe club head. The shaft sleeve 3006 is configured to support the shaftat different positions relative to the club head to achieve a desiredshaft loft and/or lie angle.

If desired, a screw capturing device, such as in the form of an o-ringor washer 3036, can be placed on the shaft of the screw 400 aboveshoulder 3012 to retain the screw in place within the club head when thescrew is loosened to permit removal of the shaft from the club head. Thering 3036 desirably is dimensioned to frictionally engage the threads ofthe screw and has an outer diameter that is greater than the centralopening in shoulder 3012 so that the ring 3036 cannot fall through theopening. When the screw 400 is tightened to secure the shaft to the clubhead, as depicted in FIG. 23, the ring 3036 desirably is not compressedbetween the shoulder 3012 and the adjacent lower surface of the shaftsleeve 3006. FIG. 24 shows the screw 400 removed from the shaft sleeve3006 to permit removal of the shaft from the club head. As shown, in thedisassembled state, the ring 3036 captures the distal end of the screwto retain the screw within the club head to prevent loss of the screw.The ring 3036 desirably comprises a polymeric or elastomeric material,such as rubber, Viton, Neoprene, silicone, or similar materials. Thering 3036 can be an o-ring having a circular cross-sectional shape asdepicted in the illustrated embodiment. Alternatively, the ring 3036 canbe a flat washer having a square or rectangular cross-sectional shape.In other embodiments, the ring 3036 can have various othercross-sectional profiles.

The shaft sleeve 3006 is shown in greater detail in FIGS. 25-28. Theshaft sleeve 3006 in the illustrated embodiment comprises an upperportion 3016 having an upper opening 3018 for receiving and a lowerportion 3020 located below the lower end of the shaft. The lower portion3020 can have a threaded opening 3034 for receiving the threaded shaftof the screw 400. The lower portion 3020 of the sleeve can comprise arotation prevention portion configured to mate with a rotationprevention portion of the hosel insert 200 to restrict relative rotationbetween the shaft and the club head. As shown, the rotation preventionportion can comprise a plurality of longitudinally extending externalsplines 500 that are adapted to mate with corresponding internal splines240 of the hosel insert 200. The lower portion 3020 and the externalsplines 500 formed thereon can have the same configuration as the shaftlower portion and splines 500.

The upper portion 3016 of the sleeve extends at an offset angle 3022relative to the lower portion 3020. As shown in FIG. 23, when insertedin the club head, the lower portion 3020 is co-axially aligned with thehosel insert 200 and the hosel opening 3004, which collectively define alongitudinal axis B. The upper portion 3016 of the shaft sleeve 3006defines a longitudinal axis A and is effective to support the shaft 3008along axis A, which is offset from longitudinal axis B by offset angle3022. Inserting the shaft sleeve at different angular positions relativeto the hosel insert is effective to adjust the shaft loft and/or the lieangle, as further described below.

As best shown in FIG. 28, the upper portion 3016 of the shaft sleevedesirably has a constant wall thickness from the lower end of opening3018 to the upper end of the shaft sleeve. A tapered surface portion3026 extends between the upper portion 3016 and the lower portion 3020.The upper portion 3016 of the shaft sleeve has an enlarged head portion3028 that defines an annular bearing surface 3030 that contacts an uppersurface 3032 of the hosel 3002 (FIG. 23). The bearing surface 3030desirably is oriented at a 90-degree angle with respect to longitudinalaxis B so that when the shaft sleeve is inserted in to the hosel, thebearing surface 3030 can make complete contact with the opposing surface3032 of the hosel through 360 degrees.

As further shown in FIG. 23, the hosel opening 3004 desirably isdimensioned to form a gap 3024 between the outer surface of the upperportion 3016 of the sleeve and the opposing internal surface of the clubhead. Because the upper portion 3016 is not co-axially aligned with thesurrounding inner surface of the hosel opening, the gap 3024 desirablyis large enough to permit the shaft sleeve to be inserted into the hoselopening with the lower portion extending into the hosel insert at eachpossible angular position relative to longitudinal axis B. For example,in the illustrated embodiment, the shaft sleeve has eight externalsplines 500 that are received between eight internal splines 240 of thehosel insert 200. This allows the sleeve to be positioned within thehosel insert at two positions spaced 180 degrees from each other, aspreviously described.

Other shaft sleeve and hosel insert configurations can be used to varythe number of possible angular positions for the shaft sleeve relativeto the longitudinal axis B. FIGS. 29 and 30, for example, show analternative shaft sleeve and hosel insert configuration in which theshaft sleeve 3006 has eight equally spaced splines 500 with radialsidewalls 502 that are received between eight equally spaced splines 240of the hosel insert 200. Each spline 500 is spaced from an adjacentspline by spacing S₁ dimensioned to receive a spline 240 of the hoselinsert having a width W₂. This allows the lower portion 3020 of theshaft sleeve to be inserted into the hosel insert 200 at eight angularlyspaced positions around longitudinal axis B. In a specific embodiment,the spacing S₁ is about 23 degrees, the arc angle of each spline 500 isabout 22 degrees, and the width W₂ is about 22.5 degrees.

As can be appreciated, the assembly shown in FIGS. 23-30 permits a shaftto be supported at different orientations relative to the club head tovary the shaft loft and/or lie angle. An advantage of the assembly ofFIGS. 23-30 is that it includes less pieces and therefore is lessexpensive to manufacture and has less mass (which allows for a reductionin overall weight).

Whereas this technology has been described in connection withrepresentative embodiments, it will be understood that it is not limitedto those embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to encompass allalternatives, modifications, combinations, and equivalents as may beincluded within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by theappended claims.

1-20. (canceled)
 21. A golf club head, comprising: a body defining aninterior cavity, a sole portion positioned at a bottom portion of thegolf club head, a crown portion positioned at a top portion of the golfclub head, and a skirt portion positioned around a periphery of the golfclub head between the sole and the crown, the body also having a forwardportion and a rearward portion and a maximum above ground height; and aface positioned at the forward portion of the body; wherein: the bodyheight is less than about 46 mm; and the face has a loft angle greaterthan about 13 degrees; and further wherein the golf club head: has acenter of gravity (CG) projection of less than about 3 mm above a centerof the face; is formed of at least one alloy of titanium; has acoefficient of restitution measured at the center of the face that is0.80 or greater; and has an above ground center-of-gravity location,Zup, less than about 19.0 mm.
 22. The golf club head of claim 21,wherein the CG projection is less than about 1.4 mm above the center ofthe face.
 23. The golf club head of claim 21, wherein the coefficient ofrestitution is about 0.82.
 24. The golf club head of claim 21, whereinthe coefficient of restitution is 0.82 or greater.
 25. The golf clubhead of claim 21, wherein a volume of the golf club head is less thanabout 240 cm³.
 26. The golf club head of claim 21, further comprising achannel defined in the sole adjacent the face.
 27. The golf club head ofclaim 21, wherein the coefficient of restitution is 0.81 or greater. 28.The golf club head of claim 21, wherein an average characteristic timeof the golf club head is no less than 241 microseconds.
 29. The golfclub head of claim 21, wherein a mass of the golf club head is betweenabout 185 grams and about 245 grams.
 30. The golf club head of claim 21,wherein a mass of the golf club head is between about 200 grams andabout 220 grams.
 31. The golf club head of claim 21, wherein the golfclub head body is substantially formed from a combination of a steelalloy and a titanium alloy.
 32. The golf club head of claim 21, whereinthe golf club head body is substantially formed from a combination of atitanium alloy and a graphitic composite.
 33. The golf club head ofclaim 21, wherein the golf club head body is substantially formed from acombination of a steel alloy, a titanium alloy, and a graphiticcomposite.
 34. The golf club head of claim 21, further comprising asleeve for securing a shaft to the golf club head.
 35. The golf clubhead of claim 21, wherein discretionary mass is added to the golf clubhead on an interior side of the sole portion at a forward location. 36.The golf club head of claim 21, wherein discretionary mass is added tothe golf club head on an outside of the sole portion.
 37. The golf clubhead of claim 36, wherein the discretionary mass is secured by one ormore welds.
 38. The golf club head of claim 36, wherein thediscretionary mass is secured by a mechanical fastener.
 39. The golfclub head of claim 36, wherein the discretionary mass is secured by oneor more screws.
 40. The golf club head of claim 36, wherein thediscretionary mass threadingly engages the sole portion.
 41. The golfclub head of claim 36, wherein the discretionary mass is formed of amaterial having a higher density than the material used to form thebody.
 42. The golf club head of claim 36, wherein the discretionary massis formed of a material having a density of from about 8 g/cc to about19 g/cc.